Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36300084›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Quality assurance for MRI-only radiation therapy: A voxel-wise population-based methodology for image and dose assessment of synthetic CT generation methods.

Hilda Chourak, Anaïs Barateau, Safaa Tahri, Capucine Cadin, Caroline Lafond, Jean-Claude Nunes, Adrien Boue-Rafle, Mathias Perazzi, Peter B Greer, Jason Dowling and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial intelligence for treatment delivery: image-guided radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Quality evaluation of synthetic CT using a gamma analysis for prostate cancer MR-only radiotherapy.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Hilda ChourakUniversity of Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.
Anaïs BarateauUniversity of Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.
Safaa TahriUniversity of Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.
Capucine CadinUniversity of Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.
Caroline LafondUniversity of Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.
Jean-Claude NunesUniversity of Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.
Adrien Boue-RafleUniversity of Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.
Mathias PerazziUniversity of Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.
Peter B GreerSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Jason DowlingThe Australian eHealth Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Health and Biosecurity, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Renaud de CrevoisierUniversity of Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.
Oscar AcostaUniversity of Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.
Inserm · FRLaboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image · FRAustralian e-Health Research Centre · AUCentre Eugène Marquis · FRCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality assurance of synthetic CT (sCT) is crucial for safe clinical transfer to an MRI-only radiotherapy planning workflow. The aim of this work is to propose a population-based process assessing local errors in the generation of sCTs and their impact on dose distribution. For the analysis to be anatomically meaningful, a customized interpatient registration method brought the population data to the same coordinate system. Then, the voxel-based process was applied on two sCT generation methods: a bulk-density method and a generative adversarial network. The CT and MRI pairs of 39 patients treated by radiotherapy for prostate cancer were used for sCT generation, and 26 of them with delineated structures were selected for analysis. Voxel-wise errors in sCT compared to CT were assessed for image intensities and dose calculation, and a population-based statistical test was applied to identify the regions where discrepancies were significant. The cumulative histograms of the mean absolute dose error per volume of tissue were computed to give a quantitative indication of the error for each generation method. Accurate interpatient registration was achieved, with mean Dice scores higher than 0.91 for all organs. The proposed method produces three-dimensional maps that precisely show the location of the major discrepancies for both sCT generation methods, highlighting the heterogeneity of image and dose errors for sCT generation methods from MRI across the pelvic anatomy. Hence, this method provides additional information that will assist with both sCT development and quality control for MRI-based planning radiotherapy.

Indexed as

dosimetric assessmentMRI-only radiation therapypopulation-based evaluationquality assurancesynthetic CT assessmentvoxel-wise analysis

Identifiers

PMID36300084
PMCPMC9589295
OpenAlexW4304144153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.