Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36300071›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

The sight of one's own body: Could qEEG help predict the treatment response in anorexia nervosa?

Marek Susta, Gustav Bizik, Anna Yamamotova, Svojmil Petranek, Marie Kadochova, Hana Papezova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marek SustaDepartment of Public Health, St. Elisabeth University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Gustav BizikDepartment of Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anna YamamotovaDepartment of Physiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Svojmil PetranekHealth Care Facility, Department of the Interior, Prague, Czechia.
Marie KadochovaDepartment of Public Health, St. Elisabeth University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Hana PapezovaDepartment of Psychiatry, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.
Vysoká Škola Zdravotníctva a Sociálnej Práce sv. Alžbety · SKAalborg University Hospital · DKCharles University · CZGeneral University Hospital in Prague · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims of the study: The study aims to identify the differences in brain activity between participants with anorexia nervosa and healthy control using visual stimulus conditions combined with the quantitative dense-array EEG recording analysis method called Brain Activation Sequences (BAS). Materials and methods: 23 participants with anorexia nervosa and 21 healthy controls were presented with visual stimuli, including the subject's facial expressions and body images. The 128-channel EEG data were processed using BAS and displayed as activity in up to 66 brain regions. Subsequent cluster analysis was used to identify groups of participants exhibiting area-specific activation patterns. Results: Cluster analysis identified three distinct groups: one including all healthy controls (HC) and two consisting of all participants with anorexia (AN-I with 19 participants and AN-II with four participants). The AN-I and AN-II groups differed in their response to treatment. Comparisons of HC vs. AN confirmed the dominance of the right cerebral hemisphere in participants with anorexia nervosa in two of the three reported conditions. The facial expressions condition, specifically the facial reaction expressing disgust, indicates the existence of a social attentional bias toward faces, whereas emotions remained undetected in participants. High limbic activity, medial frontal gyrus involvement, low fusiform cortex activity, and milder visual cortex activity in healthy controls compared to participants indicate that the facial expression stimulus is perceived by healthy subjects primarily as an emotion, not as the face itself. In the body image condition, participants showed higher activity in the fusiform gyrus and right insula, indicating activation of the brain's "fear network." Conclusion: The study describes a specific pattern of brain activation in response to facial expression of disgust and body images that likely contributes to social-cognitive and behavioral impairments in anorexia. In addition, the substantial difference in the pattern of brain activation within the participants with AN and its association with treatment resistance deserves special attention because of its potential to develop a clinically useful prediction tool and identify potential targets for, for example, neuromodulatory treatments and/or individualized psychotherapy.

Indexed as

anorexia nervosadisgustfacial expressionsperceptionqEEGtreatment response

Identifiers

PMID36300071
PMCPMC9592122
OpenAlexW4303981590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.