Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36300038›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

How perceived scarcity predicted cooperation during early pandemic lockdown.

Claudia Civai, Marta Caserotti, Elisa Carrus, Inge Huijsmans, Enrico Rubaltelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Scarcity and Cooperation: The Modulation of Social Norms.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia CivaiDivision of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
Marta CaserottiDipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Facolta' di Psicologia, Universita' degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Elisa CarrusDivision of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
Inge HuijsmansCentre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Enrico RubaltelliDipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Facolta' di Psicologia, Universita' degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both material resources (jobs, healthcare), and socio-psychological resources (social contact) decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated whether individual differences in perceived material and socio-psychological scarcity experienced during the pandemic predicted preference for cooperation, measured using two Public Good Games (PGGs), where participants contributed money or time (i.e., hours indoors contributed to shorten the lockdown). Material scarcity had no relationship with cooperation. Increased perceived scarcity of socio-psychological wellbeing (e.g., connecting with family) predicted increased preference for cooperation, suggesting that missing social contact fosters prosociality, whilst perceived scarcity of freedom (e.g., limited movement) predicted decreased willingness to spend time indoors to shorten the lockdown. The importance of considering individual differences in scarcity perception to best promote norm compliance is discussed.

Indexed as

cooperationpandemic lockdownprosocialityscarcitysocial norms

Identifiers

PMID36300038
PMCPMC9589443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.