Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36300015›Full record

ArticleNature and science of sleep2022

Validation of PiezoSleep Scoring Against EEG/EMG Sleep Scoring in Rats.

Irina Topchiy, Anne M Fink, Katherine A Maki, Michael W Calik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Nutrients · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irina Topchiy *Center for Sleep and Health Research, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anne M FinkCenter for Sleep and Health Research, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9894-6352
Katherine A MakiDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing Science; University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-960X
Michael W Calik *Center for Sleep and Health Research, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6295-7420
University of Illinois Chicago · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Neurobiological Mechanisms of Sympathetic Regulation in Sleep ApneaR00NR014369 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI FINK, ANNE M · 2015 to 2017
$734k
NINR NIH HHS R00 NR014369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Current methods of sleep research in rodents involve invasive surgical procedures of EEG and EMG electrodes implantation. Recently, a new method of measuring sleep, PiezoSleep, has been validated against implanted electrodes in mice and rats. PiezoSleep uses a piezoelectric film transducer to detect the rodent's movements and respiration and employs an algorithm to automatically score sleep. Here, we validate PiezoSleep scoring versus EEG/EMG implanted electrodes sleep scoring in rats. Methods: Adult male Brown Norway and Wistar Kyoto rats were implanted with bilateral stainless-steel screws into the skull for EEG recording and bilateral wire electrodes into the nuchal muscles for EMG assessment. In Brown Norway rats, the EEG/EMG electrode leads were soldered to a miniature connector plug and fixed to the skull. In Wistar Kyoto rats, the EEG/EMG leads were tunneled subcutaneously to a telemetry transmitter implanted in the flank. Rats were allowed to recover from surgery for one week. Brown Norway rats were placed in PiezoSleep cages, and had their headsets connected to cable for recording EEG/EMG signals, which were then manually scored by a human scorer in 10-sec epochs. Wistar Kyoto rats were placed in PiezoSleep cages, and EEG/EMG signals were recorded using a telemetry system (DSI). Sleep was scored automatically in 4-sec epochs using NeuroScore software. PiezoSleep software recorded and scored sleep in the rats. Results: Rats implanted with corded EEG/EMG headsets had 85.6% concurrence of sleep-wake scoring with PiezoSleep. Rats implanted with EEG/EMG telemetry had 80.8% concurrence sleep-wake scoring with PiezoSleep. Sensitivity and specificity rates were similar between the EEG/EMG recording systems. Total sleep time and hourly sleep times did not differ in all three systems. However, automatic sleep detection by NeuroScore classified more sleep during the light period compared to the PiezoSleep. Conclusion: We showed that PiezoSleep system can be a reliable alternative to both automatic and visual EEG/EMG- based sleep-wake scoring in rat.

Indexed as

automated sleep scoringEEG/EMGnoninvasive sleep scoringpiezoelectricrattelemetry

Identifiers

PMID36300015
PMCPMC9590343
OpenAlexW4306953241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.