Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36299965›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Giant Pseudocyst of the Pancreas: A Case Report.

Harjit Singh Nalwa, Santh Prakash Lanka, Raul Mederos

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Harjit Singh NalwaGeneral Surgery, D.Y. Patil University School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Santh Prakash LankaGeneral Surgery, Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada, IND.
Raul MederosSurgery, Hialeah Hospital, Hialeah, USA.
Clinical Pharmacology of Miami · USRangaraya Medical College · INUniversity of Mumbai · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cysts are usually asymptomatic over 70% of the time. They can be benign or malignant. Enhanced imaging modalities and increased usage of routine imaging have increased the identification of pancreatic cysts. If symptomatic, abdominal pain or back pain, unexplained weight loss, jaundice, steatorrhea or palpable mass are usually the presenting complaints. Pancreatic cysts are typically assessed by cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this article, we present a case of a 33-year-old female with a recurrent large pancreatic pseudocyst, initially measured 15.8 cm x 14 cm x 14 cm, who was subsequently admitted to our unit and managed successfully. After undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy, exploratory laparotomy, and pancreatic cystogastrostomy, the pseudocyst shrunk to 8 cm x 6 cm over 13 weeks. It is rare to come across a pseudocyst of such large dimensions. Despite its large size, the patient presented with vague abdominal pain as the only chief complaint. The unusual presentation of symptoms and the enormous size of the pseudocyst make this a unique case. Managing giant pancreatic pseudocysts can be complex, as seen in this scenario by the multiple approaches attempted to treat the pseudocyst.

Indexed as

cystogastrostomygiant pancreatic pseudocysthuge pseudocyst of the pancreaspancreas diseasepancreatic cyst

Identifiers

PMID36299965
PMCPMC9587752
OpenAlexW4296686443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.