Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36299872›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Human embryonic stem cell-derived endothelial cell product injection attenuates cardiac remodeling in myocardial infarction.

Ana-Mishel Spiroski, Ian R McCracken, Adrian Thomson, Marlene Magalhaes-Pinto, Mukesh K Lalwani, Kathryn J Newton, Eileen Miller, Cecile Bénézech, Patrick Hadoke, Mairi Brittan and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ana-Mishel SpiroskiCentre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ian R McCrackenCentre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Adrian ThomsonEdinburgh Preclinical Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Marlene Magalhaes-PintoCentre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Mukesh K LalwaniCentre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Kathryn J NewtonCentre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Eileen MillerCentre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Cecile BénézechCentre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Patrick HadokeCentre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Mairi BrittanCentre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Joanne C MountfordScottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Abdelaziz BeqqaliCentre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Gillian A GrayCentre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Andrew H BakerCentre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
University of Edinburgh · GBThe Queen's Medical Research Institute · GBCentre for Inflammation Research · GBMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine · GBScottish National Blood Transfusion Service · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/11/2/28733British Heart Foundation FS/17/27/32698British Heart Foundation RG/14/3/30706Medical Research Council MR/M011542/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mechanisms contributing to tissue remodeling of the infarcted heart following cell-based therapy remain elusive. While cell-based interventions have the potential to influence the cardiac healing process, there is little direct evidence of preservation of functional myocardium. Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate tissue remodeling in the infarcted heart following human embryonic stem cell-derived endothelial cell product (hESC-ECP) therapy. Materials and methods: Following coronary artery ligation (CAL) to induce cardiac ischemia, we investigated infarct size at 1 day post-injection in media-injected controls (CALM, Results: Human embryonic stem cell-derived endothelial cell product injection reduces the infarct area (CALM: 54.5 ± 5.0%, CALC: 21.3 ± 4.9%), and end-diastolic (CALM: 87.8 ± 8.9 uL, CALC: 63.3 ± 2.7 uL) and end-systolic ventricular volume (CALM: 56.4 ± 9.3 uL, CALC: 33.7 ± 2.6 uL). LRI analyses indicate an alternative immunomodulatory effect mediated Conclusion: Delivery of the live hESC-ECP following CAL modulates the wound healing response during acute pathological remodeling, reducing infarct area, and preserving functional myocardium in this relatively acute model. Potential intrinsic myocardial cellular/hESC-ECP interactions indicate that discreet immunomodulation could provide novel therapeutic avenues to improve cardiac outcomes following myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

cell therapyhESC-ECPimmunomodulationligand–receptor interactionmyocardial infarctionscRNAseq

Identifiers

PMID36299872
PMCPMC9588936
OpenAlexW4303986712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.