Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36299868›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Prediction and prognosis of reintubation after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection.

Xingxing Yao, Jin Wang, Yang Lu, Xiaofan Huang, Xinling Du, Fuqiang Sun, Yangchao Zhao, Fei Xie, Dashuai Wang, Chao Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xingxing YaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jin WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Sixth People's Hospital of Luohe, Luohe, China.
Yang LuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaofan HuangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xinling DuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Fuqiang SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yangchao ZhaoDepartment of Extracorporeal Life Support Center, Department of Cardiac Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Fei XieDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Dashuai WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Chao LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNUnion Hospital · CNLuohe Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reintubation is a serious adverse respiratory event after Stanford type A aortic dissection surgery (AADS), however, published studies focused on reintubation after AADS are very limited worldwide. The objectives of the current study were to establish an early risk prediction model for reintubation after AADS and to clarify its relationship with short-term and long-term prognosis. Methods: Patients undergoing AADS between 2016-2019 in a single institution were identified and divided into two groups based on whether reintubation was performed. Independent predictors were identified by univariable and multivariable analysis and a clinical prediction model was then established. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap method with 1,000 replications. The relationship between reintubation and clinical outcomes was determined by univariable and propensity score matching analysis. Results: Reintubation were performed in 72 of the 492 included patients (14.6%). Three preoperative and one intraoperative predictors for reintubation were identified by multivariable analysis, including older age, smoking history, renal insufficiency and transfusion of intraoperative red blood cells. The model established using the above four predictors showed moderate discrimination (AUC = 0.753, 95% CI, [0.695-0.811]), good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ Conclusions: The requirement of reintubation after AADS is prevalent, closely related to adverse in-hospital outcomes, but there is no statistically significant association between reintubation and long-term outcomes. Predictors were identified and a risk model predicting reintubation was established, which may have clinical utility in early individualized risk assessment and targeted intervention.

Indexed as

aortic dissectionpredictive modelprognosisreintubationrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36299868
PMCPMC9592067
OpenAlexW4303980825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.