ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
The UQ Flap: A Novel Modification of the Keystone Flap.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modified Keystone a Versatile Flap Reconstruction for Mastectomy Defects: Our Clinical Experience.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2025Article
- The Keystone Design Perforator Flap: A Flap to Simplify Complex Reconstructive Issues.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2024Article
- Article
- The Modified UQ Flap: An Alternative for Other Flaps.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound closure following excisions on the leg (between the knee and ankle), including the distal leg, is challenged by limited skin laxity. The keystone flap, first described by Behan in 2003, was proposed as one solution, but with a significant complication rate on the distal leg. This pilot study introduces a novel modification of the keystone flap, named the UQ flap, differing from other modifications, with an un-incised portion on one flap border and a unique curved leading-edge to absorb tension and distribute shearing forces in different directions, providing improved flap security and vascularization. The UQ flap was performed on 10 patients in two formats of "U" and "Q" also with two different orientations as base-proximal and base-distal. Other variations including minor deviation from the longitudinal axis, and double flap, were also performed. Except for one case with minor infection, there were no complications, and the results were favorable. No fasciotomy or undermining was required. The UQ flap proved to be a safe and convenient method of wound closure on the leg, including the distal leg. Compared with the keystone flap, there were reduced incisions leading to improved vascularity and less healthy tissue trimming. Its unique shape provided flap flexibility facilitating easy adjustment to the defects. The order and direction of wound closure after the excision of the lesion and incision of the flap are critical.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.