Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36299801›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in global women's health2022

Advancing maternal and perinatal health in low- and middle-income countries: A multi-country review of policies and programmes.

Uzma Syed, Mary V Kinney, Ekaterine Pestvenidze, Alren O Vandy, Karin Slowing, Janet Kayita, Alyona F Lewis, Sartie Kenneh, Francis L Moses, Atiya Aabroo and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in global women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Uzma SyedWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mary V KinneySchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
Ekaterine PestvenidzeWorld Health Organization, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Alren O VandyWorld Health Organization, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Karin SlowingPan American Health Organization, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Janet KayitaWorld Health Organization, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Alyona F LewisWorld Health Organization, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Sartie KennehMinistry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Francis L MosesMinistry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Atiya AabrooMinistry of NHSR&C, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ellen ThomWorld Health Organization, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Qudsia UzmaWorld Health Organization, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Nabila ZakaWorld Health Organization, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Kim RattanaNational Maternal and Child Health Centre, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Kannitha CheangWorld Health Organization, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Robert M KankeWorld Health Organization, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Brigitte KiniWorld Health Organization, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Jean-Bertin E EpondoMinistry of Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Allisyn C MoranWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize maternal mortality reduction, with a global average target of < 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030. Current pace of reduction is far short of what is needed to achieve the global target. It is estimated that globally there are 300,000 maternal deaths, 2.4 million newborn deaths and 2 million stillbirths annually. Majority of these deaths occur in low-and-middle-income countries. Global initiatives like, Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality (EPMM) and Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP), have outlined the broad strategies for maternal and newborn health programmes. A set of coverage targets and ten milestones were launched to support low-and-middle-income countries in accelerating progress in improving maternal, perinatal and newborn health and wellbeing. WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA, undertook a scoping review to understand how country strategies evolved in different contexts over the past two decades to improve maternal survival and wellbeing, and how countries in similar settings could accelerate progress considering the changing epidemiology and demography. Case studies were conducted to inform countries in similar settings and various global initiatives. Six countries were selected based on standard criteria-Cambodia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Georgia, Guatemala, Pakistan and Sierra Leone representing different stages of the obstetric transition. A conceptual framework, encapsulating the interrelated factors impacting maternal health outcomes, was used to organize data collection and analysis. While all six countries made remarkable progress in improving maternal and perinatal health, the pace of progress and the factors influencing the successes and challenges varied across the countries. The context, opportunities and challenges varied from country to country. Two strategic directions were identified for next steps including the need to implement and evaluate innovative service delivery models using an updated obstetric transition as an organizing framework and expanding our vision to address equity and well-being.

Indexed as

country case studiesevolution of maternal healthfactors influencing maternal and perinatal healthlow-and-middle-income countriesmaternal health policy and programme

Identifiers

PMID36299801
PMCPMC9589433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.