ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Artificial neural networks predict the need for permanent cerebrospinal fluid diversion following posterior fossa tumor resection.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting postoperative hydrocephalus in 1,073 posterior fossa tumor patients.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Comparison of various predictive tools in predicting risk of cerebrospinal fluid diversion post-resection of posterior fossa tumors: A systematic review.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Resection of posterior fossa tumors (PFTs) can result in hydrocephalus that requires permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. Our goal was to prospectively validate a machine-learning model to predict postoperative hydrocephalus after PFT surgery requiring permanent CSF diversion. Methods: We collected preoperative and postoperative variables on 518 patients that underwent PFT surgery at our center in a retrospective fashion to train several statistical classifiers to predict the need for permanent CSF diversion as a binary class. A total of 62 classifiers relevant to our data structure were surveyed, including regression models, decision trees, Bayesian models, and multilayer perceptron artificial neural networks (ANN). Models were trained using the ( Results: Twelve percent of patients required permanent CSF diversion after PFT surgery. Of the trained models, 8 classifiers had an AUC greater than 0.5 on prospective testing. ANNs demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.902 with a positive predictive value of 83.3%. Despite comparable AUC, the remaining classifiers had a true positive rate below 35% (compared to ANN, Conclusions: ANN-based models can reliably predict the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt after PFT surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.