ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
A novel integrated angioscope-laser system for atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion: Feasibility and techniques.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endovascular Detection of Catheter-Thrombus Contact by Vacuum Excitation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Atherosclerotic extracranial carotid artery stenosis accounts for about 20%-30% of all strokes, which is one of the leading causes of adult morbidity and mortality. Although carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is still the mainly operational manner for atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis/occlusion (ACAS/ACAO), and carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) have been used as an alternative, both CEA and CAS have limitations of their own, such as extensive invasiveness and in-stent restenosis. Methods: In this study we established a novel interventional system Results: All the carotid atherosclerotic plaques were completely ablated by Ho:YAG laser and/or TFL. The Ho:YAG laser was more effective for the atherosclerotic plaques with severe calcification, while the TFL was more suitable for those with moderate calcification. There were still some thermal injury spots on the inner wall of the parent carotid artery caused by the laser in the non-protected group B. In the protected group A, on the contrary, there was no even a thermal injury spot was found on the relevant location except for one sample. The difference of ablating duration was statistically significant between group A (36.5 ± 4.79 min) and group B (63.4 ± 6.55 min) ( Conclusion: According to our knowledge, this is the first attempt to ablate carotid atherosclerotic plaques assisted by the ZebraScope™
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.