ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology
Automated Brain Metastases Segmentation With a Deep Dive Into False-positive Detection.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Anatomic Contextual Information on the Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network Tasked With Brain Metastasis Detection.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Blinded, bias-controlled multi-rater evaluation of human-versus-AI brain metastasis segmentation using a hybrid foundation-model framework.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Transformer-encoded nnU-Net with local region perceptron and contrastive learning (TLC-nnUNet) for multiple brain metastasis detection and delineation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Current Understanding and Future Directions.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Evaluation of deep learning-based methods for automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases in T1-contrast MRI for stereotactic radiosurgery.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing Quantitative Performance and Expert Review of Multiple Deep Learning-Based Frameworks for Computed Tomography-based Abdominal Organ Auto-Segmentation.Intelligent oncology · 2025Article
- Automated segmentation of brain metastases in T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images pre and post stereotactic radiosurgery.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in the task of segmentation and classification of brain metastases images: current challenges and future opportunities.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Extended nnU-Net for Brain Metastasis Detection and Segmentation in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With a Large Multi-Institutional Data Set.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Article
- Automatic detection and multi-component segmentation of brain metastases in longitudinal MRI.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Landmark-based auto-contouring of clinical target volumes for radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Segmentation of Brain Metastases Using Background Layer Statistics (BLAST).AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Development of RLK-Unet: a clinically favorable deep learning algorithm for brain metastasis detection and treatment response assessment.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The clinical management of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is difficult, because a physician must review follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to determine treatment outcome, which is often labor intensive. The purpose of this study was to develop an automated framework to contour brain metastases in MRI to help treatment planning for SRS and understand its limitations. Methods and Materials: Two self-adaptive nnU-Net models trained on postcontrast 3-dimensional T1-weighted MRI scans from patients who underwent SRS were analyzed. Performance was evaluated by computing positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The training and testing sets included 3482 metastases on 845 patient MRI scans and 930 metastases on 206 patient MRI scans, respectively. Results: In the per-patient analysis, PPV was 90.1% ± 17.7%, sensitivity 88.4% ± 18.0%, DSC 82.2% ± 9.5%, and false positive (FP) 0.4 ± 1.0. For large metastases (≥6 mm), the per-patient PPV was 95.6% ± 17.5%, sensitivity 94.5% ± 18.1%, DSC 86.8% ± 7.5%, and FP 0.1 ± 0.4. The quality of autosegmented true-positive (TP) contours was also assessed by 2 physicians using a 5-point scale for clinical acceptability. Seventy-five percent of contours were assigned scores of 4 or 5, which shows that contours could be used as-is in clinical application, and the remaining 25% were assigned a score of 3, which means they needed minor editing only. Notably, a deep dive into FPs indicated that 9% were TP metastases not identified on the original radiology review, but identified on subsequent follow-up imaging (early detection). Fifty-four percent were real metastases (TP) that were identified but purposefully not contoured for target treatment, mainly because the patient underwent whole-brain radiation therapy before/after SRS treatment. Conclusions: These findings show that our tool can help radiologists and radiation oncologists detect and contour tumors from MRI, make precise decisions about suspicious lesions, and potentially find lesions at early stages.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.