ReviewPatient preference and adherence2022
A Systematic Review of Patient Preferences, Expectations, and Values for the Management and Treatment of Hypertension.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do patients' and doctors' perceptions about cardiovascular outcomes coincide? A one-to-one survey at in-hospital and outpatient level.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Factors that determine patients considering medication for the disease of obesity: an IMI2 SOPHIA study.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Article
- Patient Practices, Perceptions, and Barriers to Self-measurement of Blood Pressure in a Rural Health System.American journal of hypertension · 2024Article
- Experiences, acceptability and feasibility of an isometric exercise intervention for stage 1 hypertension: embedded qualitative study in a randomised controlled feasibility trial.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- Conjoint Analysis of Telemedicine Preferences for Hypertension Management Among Adult Patients.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024Article
- Reimagining Medication Adherence: A Novel Holistic Model for Hypertension Therapy.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Sex differences in effect of patients-centered intervention on blood pressure in patients with hypertension.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Innovative Remote Management Solutions for the Control of Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To comprehensively summarize the evidence on the preferences, expectations, and values of hypertension management and treatment in hypertensive patients. Methods: From inception through January 2022, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for studies with hypertension value, preference, or expectation. A qualitative retrospective analysis was performed. Results: A total of 24 studies involving 8701 participants were included. Although studies on the preferences of hypertensive patients are difficult to standardize, considerable convergence has occurred: 1) Patients preferred treatment regimens with lower incidence of comorbidities, faster response, lower cost, more frequent blood pressure monitoring, fewer side effects, and more convenient medication. 2) Patients have a crucial role in the treatment, and their physicians are expected to develop a shared patient-centered decision-making model. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review demonstrated that side effects, cost, and convenience are important factors for patients when selecting a treatment regimen for hypertension. Patients often obtain hypertension information from their physicians and prefer shared patient-centered decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.