Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36299485›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2022

Advance of genetically modified pigs in xeno-transplantation.

Jiacheng Deng, Lin Yang, Ziru Wang, Hongsheng Ouyang, Hao Yu, Hongming Yuan, Daxin Pang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetically engineered porcine liver: a new era in transplantation.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Pig Models in Retinal Research and Retinal Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Developments in kidney xenotransplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiacheng DengCollege of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Lin YangCollege of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Ziru WangCollege of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Hongsheng OuyangCollege of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Hao YuCollege of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Hongming YuanCollege of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Daxin PangCollege of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the standard of living improves, chronic diseases and end-stage organ failure have been a regular occurrence in human beings. Organ transplantation has become one of the hopes in the fight against chronic diseases and end-stage organ failure. However, organs available for transplantation are far from sufficient to meet the demand, leading to a major organ shortage crisis. To solve this problem, researchers have turned to pigs as their target since pigs have many advantages as xenograft donors. Pigs are considered the ideal organ donor for human xenotransplantation, but direct transplantation of porcine organs to humans faces many obstacles, such as hyperacute rejection, acute humoral xenograft rejection, coagulation dysregulation, inflammatory response, coagulation dysregulation, and endogenous porcine retroviral infection. Many transgenic strategies have been developed to overcome these obstacles. This review provides an overview of current advances in genetically modified pigs for xenotransplantation. Future genetic engineering-based delivery of safe and effective organs and tissues for xenotransplantation remains our goal.

Indexed as

gene editingpigsxenograft donorsxenograft rejectionxeno-transplantation

Identifiers

PMID36299485
PMCPMC9590650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.