Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36299444›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2022

Orthotopic Transplantation of the Full-length Porcine Intestine After Normothermic Machine Perfusion.

Nader Abraham, Elsa K Ludwig, Cecilia R Schaaf, Brittany Veerasammy, Amy S Stewart, Caroline McKinney, John Freund, John Brassil, Kannan P Samy, Qimeng Gao and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Normothermic Preservation of the Intestinal Allograft.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  4. Comparison of the effects of normothermic machine perfusion and cold storage preservation on porcine intestinal allograft regenerative potential and viability.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nader AbrahamDuke Ex-Vivo Organ Lab (DEVOL), Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Elsa K LudwigIntestinal Regenerative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Cecilia R SchaafIntestinal Regenerative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Brittany VeerasammyIntestinal Regenerative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Amy S StewartIntestinal Regenerative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Caroline McKinneyIntestinal Regenerative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
John FreundIntestinal Regenerative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
John BrassilFunctional Circulation, LLC, Lake Mills, WI.
Kannan P SamyDuke Ex-Vivo Organ Lab (DEVOL), Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Qimeng GaoDuke Ex-Vivo Organ Lab (DEVOL), Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Riley KahanDuke Ex-Vivo Organ Lab (DEVOL), Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Donna NiedzwieckiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Diana M CardonaDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Katherine S GarmanDuke Ex-Vivo Organ Lab (DEVOL), Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Andrew S BarbasDuke Ex-Vivo Organ Lab (DEVOL), Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Debra L SudanDuke Ex-Vivo Organ Lab (DEVOL), Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Liara M GonzalezIntestinal Regenerative Medicine Lab, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
Translational Research Workforce Training: Leveraging the Veterinary SpecialistU01TR002953 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI TREPANIER, LAUREN A · 2019 to 2024
$2.6M
Therapeutic strategies to improve function of high risk liver graftsK08AI150990 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BARBAS, ANDREW SERGHIOS · 2020 to 2022
$512k
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002953NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI150990NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful intestinal transplantation is currently hindered by graft injury that occurs during procurement and storage, which contributes to postoperative sepsis and allograft rejection. Improved graft preservation may expand transplantable graft numbers and enhance posttransplant outcomes. Superior transplant outcomes have recently been demonstrated in clinical trials using machine perfusion to preserve the liver. We hypothesized that machine perfusion preservation of intestinal allografts could be achieved and allow for transplantation in a porcine model. Methods: Using a translational porcine model, we developed a device for intestinal perfusion. Intestinal samples were collected at the time of organ procurement, and after 6 h of machine perfusion for gross and histologic evaluation, hourly chemistry panels were performed on the perfusate and were used for protocol optimization. Following transplantation, porcine recipient physical activity, systemic blood parameters, and vital signs were monitored for 2 d before sacrifice. Results: In initial protocol development (generation 1, n = 8 grafts), multiple metabolic, electrolyte, and acid-base derangements were measured. These factors coincided with graft and mesenteric edema and luminal hemorrhage and were addressed with the addition of dialysis. In the subsequent protocol (generation 2, n = 9 grafts), differential jejunum and ileum perfusion were observed resulting in gross evidence of ileal ischemia. Modifications in vasodilating medications enhanced ileal perfusion (generation 3, n = 4 grafts). We report successful transplantation of 2 porcine intestinal allografts after machine perfusion with postoperative clinical and gross evidence of normal gut function. Conclusions: This study reports development and optimization of machine perfusion preservation of small intestine and successful transplantation of intestinal allografts in a porcine model.

Identifiers

PMID36299444
PMCPMC9592306
OpenAlexW4307494608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.