Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36299374›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2022

The utility of

Agata Pietrzak, Andrzej Marszałek, Tomasz Piotrowski, Katarzyna Pietrasz, Adrianna Medak, Julia Wojtowicz, Hubert Szweda, Krzysztof Matuszewski, Witold Cholewiński

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A Rare Case of Primary Pulmonary Meningioma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Agata PietrzakElectroradiology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0476-5655
Andrzej MarszałekChair of Oncologic Pathology and Prophylaxis Poznan University of Medical Sciences and the Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.
Tomasz PiotrowskiElectroradiology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna PietraszNuclear Medicine Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.
Adrianna MedakElectroradiology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland (student).
Julia WojtowiczMedical Faculty, Lodz Medical University, Lodz, Poland (student).
Hubert SzwedaMedical Physics Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.
Krzysztof MatuszewskiMedical Physics Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.
Witold CholewińskiElectroradiology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Greater Poland Cancer Center · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLMedical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the study was to discuss whether 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( Materials and methods: Analysis of international societies recommendations compared with the original data obtained in over 1000 consecutive torso and brain Results: According to the international societies recommendations, the Conclusions: The

Indexed as

18F-fluorodeoxyglucosebrain tumouroncology

Identifiers

PMID36299374
PMCPMC9591030
OpenAlexW4284966773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.