Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36299371›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2022

Validation of the cough phenotype TBQ among elderly Finnish subjects.

Heikki O Koskela, Johanna T Kaulamo, Tuomas A Selander, Anne M Lätti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heikki O KoskelaUnit for Medicine and Clinical Research, Pulmonary Division, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-3262
Johanna T KaulamoSchool of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Tuomas A SelanderScience Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Anne M LättiUnit for Medicine and Clinical Research, Pulmonary Division, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7747-6021

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Phenotypes can be utilised in the clinical management of disorders. Approaches to phenotype disorders have evolved from subjective expert opinion to data-driven methodologies. A previous cluster analysis among working-age subjects with cough revealed a phenotype TBQ (triggers, background disorders, quality-of-life impairment), which included 38% of the subjects with cough. The present study was carried out to validate this phenotyping among elderly, retired subjects with cough. Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study conducted Results: Two clusters were identified. Cluster A included 75.2% of the subjects and cluster B 24.8% of the subjects. The three most important variables to separate the clusters were the number of cough triggers (mean±sd 2.47±2.34 Conclusion: The phenotype TBQ could be identified also among elderly, retired subjects with cough, thus validating the previous phenotyping among working-age subjects. The main underlying pathophysiological feature separating the phenotype TBQ from the common cough phenotype is probably hypersensitivity of the cough reflex arc.

Identifiers

PMID36299371
PMCPMC9589332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.