ArticleJournal of dental sciences2022
Relationship between subjective taste sensations and taste strip test in patients with taste disorders with and without burning mouth syndrome.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of the new dry taste assessment method TASENS in older adults: a pilot study in two European countries.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- Clinical and gustatory features in taste disorder patients based on oral Candida culture status.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Variations in basic taste perception and body mass index.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Article
- Determination of objective taste perception among Iranian medical sciences students during COVID‑19 pandemic in Yazd, Eastern Iran: a case-control pilot study.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Quantitive Assessment of Gustatory Function and Its Association with Demographics, and Systemic Morbidity.Biology · 2024Article
- Effect of Age and Gender on Taste Function as Measured by the Waterless Empirical Taste Test.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Simple Taste Test for Clinical Assessment of Taste and Oral Somatosensory Function-The "Seven-iTT".Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Both subjective and objective evaluations are required to assess taste function. Evaluation of taste function has important clinical significances in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) due to pain-taste interactions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between subjective and objective taste evaluations in patients with taste disorders based on the presence of BMS. Materials and methods: Fifty-one patients with taste disturbances were included. The patients completed questionnaires on subjective taste sensations. The taste strip test was performed to examine objective taste function. The patients were divided into two groups: subjects with BMS (n = 24, 3 males and 21 females) and without BMS (n = 27, 8 males and 19 females). Results: Significant differences were not observed in age, age distribution, and gender distribution between the groups. There were no significant differences in self-reported taste abilities based on the presence of BMS. However, the taste strip test showed higher correct answer rates for bitterness ( Conclusion: In patients with taste disorders, patients with BMS had significant correlations between subjective and objective evaluations and different distributions in the types of taste disorders compared with those without BMS. The presence or absence of BMS should be evaluated in the diagnosis and management of taste disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.