Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36299336›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2022

Oral cancer research in Taiwan and mainland China: Scientometric analysis with emphasis on distinctive characteristics.

Cheng Xie, Jianbo Ou, Huan Shi, Wei Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheng XieDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Jianbo OuDepartment of Minzhu Road, Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Huan ShiCollege of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.
Wei LiuCollege of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientometric analysis of a disease is often conducted to recognize research hotspots and investigate latest trends. In this brief report, we provide a scientometric overview of oral cancer research in Taiwan and mainland China. There were 1924 and 3853 articles on oral cancer research originating from Taiwan and mainland China, respectively. In Taiwan, the risk factors including areca/betel quid chewing, tobacco smoking, and alcohol use were the distinctive keywords. For basic research, genotype, reactive oxygen, p53, mitochondria and caspase-9 were the distinctive keywords. In mainland China, experiment methods such as genetic transfection, gene silencing, colony formation, tumor xenograft were the distinctive keywords. Epithelial mesenchymal transition, long untranslated RNA, protein function, uvomorulin, and Bcl-2 were the distinctive keywords of basic research. Collectively, we hope that these scientometric characteristics will aid clinicians and researchers for obtaining information on oral cancer and can be of guidance for future studies.

Indexed as

BibliometricCitation analysisOral squamous cell carcinomaResearch hotspotsRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36299336
PMCPMC9588841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.