Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36299250›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2022

Dedicated teams to optimize quality and safety of surgery: A systematic review.

C M Lentz, R A F De Lind Van Wijngaarden, F Willeboordse, L Hooft, M J van der Laan

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. What supports sustainable pace in the operating room? A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study using self-determination theory.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A European survey on non-technical skills in robotic thoracic surgery for lung resections.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C M LentzDepartment of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3350-4486
R A F De Lind Van WijngaardenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands.
F WilleboordseKnowledge Institute of Medical Specialists, Mercatorlaan 1200, Utrecht 3528 BL, The Netherlands.
L HooftCochrane Netherlands/Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University, Utrecht Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
M J van der LaanDepartment of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3125-1342
University Medical Center Groningen · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Stichting Kwaliteitsgelden Medisch Specialisten 46519978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA dedicated operating team is defined as a surgical team consisting of the same group of people working together over time, optimally attuned in both technical and/or communicative aspects. This can be achieved through technical and/or communicative training in a team setting. A dedicated surgical team may contribute to the optimization of healthcare quality and patient safety within the perioperative period.

methodA systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effects of a dedicated surgical team on clinical and performance outcomes. MEDLINE and Embase were searched on 23 June 2022. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) were included. Primary outcomes were mortality, complications and readmissions. Secondary outcomes were costs and performance measures.

resultsFourteen studies were included (RCTs n = 1; NRSs n = 13). Implementation of dedicated operating teams was associated with improvements in mortality, turnover time, teamwork, communication and costs. No significant differences were observed in readmission rates and length of hospital stay. Results regarding duration, glitch counts and complications of surgery were inconclusive. Limitations include study conduct and heterogeneity between studies.

conclusionsThe institution of surgical teams who followed communicative and/or technical training appeared to have beneficial effects on several clinical outcome measures. Dedicated teams provide a feasible way of improving healthcare quality and patient safety. A dose-response effect of team training was reported, but also a relapse rate, suggesting that repetitive training is of major concern to high-quality patient care. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings, due to limited level of evidence in current literature. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020145288.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient Care TeamHumansLength of StayPatient SafetyQuality of Health Carededicated teamoperative processqualitysafetysurgeryteam training

Identifiers

PMID36299250
PMCPMC9606443
OpenAlexW4307642978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.