[Comparative study of the effects between second toe tibial dorsal artery flap and second toe tibial plantar proper artery flap in repairing finger skin and soft tissue defects].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

1. [Efficacy of free lateral arm tissue flap in repairing complex finger wounds].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026
   Article
2. [Curative effects of ultrathin anterolateral femoral flap in one-stage split-finger repair of palmar combined with multiple finger wounds].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023
   Observational

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as