ReviewViruses2022
Assessment of Adherence to Clinical Guidelines in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.
Review in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The interprofessional nurse-physician model in comprehensive management of chronic hepatitis B: An updated review.Journal of virus eradication · 2025Review
- Exosomal HBV-DNA for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of chronic hepatitis B.Open life sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Adherence to guidelines is associated with improved long-term outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to study the degree of adherence and determinants of non-adherence to management guidelines in a low endemic country. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of all CHB patients who visited our outpatient clinic in 2020. Adherence to guidelines was assessed based on predefined criteria based on the EASL guidance, and included the initiation of antiviral therapy when indicated, the optimal choice of antiviral therapy based on comorbidities, an assessment of HAV/HCV/HDV/HIV serostatus, renal function monitoring and enrolment in a HCC surveillance program if indicated. The adherence rates were compared across types of outpatient clinic (dedicated viral hepatitis clinic versus general hepatology clinic). Results: We enrolled 482 patients. Among the 276 patients with an indication for antiviral therapy, 268 (97.1%) received treatment. Among the patients with renal and/or bone disease, 26/29 (89.7%) received the optimal choice of antiviral agent. The assessment of HAV/HCV/HDV/HIV serostatus was performed in 86.1/91.7/94.4/78.4%. Among the 91 patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil, 57 (62.6%) underwent monitoring of renal function. Of the 241 patients with an indication for HCC surveillance, 212 (88.3%) were enrolled in a surveillance program. Clinics dedicated to viral hepatitis had superior adherence rates compared to general hepatology clinics (complete adherence rates 63.6% versus 37.2%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Follow-up at a dedicated viral hepatitis clinic was associated with superior adherence to management guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.