Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36298633›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Understanding the Impact of Approved but Unfunded Vaccine Status on Parental Acceptance of an Adjuvanted Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for Infants: Results from the Pediatric Influenza Vaccination Optimization Trial (PIVOT)-III.

William A Fisher, Vladimir Gilca, Michelle Murti, Alison Orth, Hartley Garfield, Paul Roumeliotis, Emmanouil Rampakakis, Vivien Brown, John Yaremko, Paul Van Buynder and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

William A FisherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Vladimir GilcaDépartement de Médecine Sociale Et Préventive, Faculté de Médecine, Institut Nationale de Sante Publique du Québec, Université Laval, Québec City, QC G1V 5B3, Canada.
Michelle MurtiDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.
Alison OrthFraser Health Authority, Vancouver, BC V3T 0H1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9596-3763
Hartley GarfieldThe Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
Paul RoumeliotisEastern Ontario Health Unit, Cornwall, ON K6J 5T1, Canada.
Emmanouil RampakakisJSS Medical Research, Montreal, QC H4S 1N8, Canada.
Vivien BrownDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada.
John YaremkoThe Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Paul Van BuynderSchool of Medicine, Griffith University, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Constantina BoikosSeqirus, Montreal, QC H9H 4M7, Canada.
James A MansiSeqirus, Montreal, QC H9H 4M7, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAFraser Health · CAGDI Integrated Facility Services (Canada) · CAGriffith University · AUInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV) provides enhanced protection against influenza for infants but is not publicly funded (NPF). The objective of this prospective cohort study of parents with children 6 through 23 months of age was to understand how NPF status influences parental perceptions of approved but unfunded vaccines and their intentions to vaccinate. At healthy baby visits, clinicians provided parents with information about influenza and vaccination. Before and after these interactions, a research nurse assessed parents' intentions to vaccinate their children and their beliefs about the safety, efficacy, and necessity of vaccinating their children with aTIV in both publicly funded (PF) and NPF settings. Overall, 15 community practice clinics (n = 15 physicians) and nine public health clinics (n = 9 nurses) recruited 207 parents. The percentage of parents intending to immunize their children with aTIV decreased from 72% (vaccine PF, free of charge), to 42% (NPF, $25 per dose), to 27% (NPF, $50 per dose). Funding status strongly influenced whether parents perceived immunization with aTIV to be necessary, safe, and effective. Information on influenza and influenza vaccines should be provided to parents routinely to allow for well-informed decisions on the suitability of specific influenza vaccines for their child.

Indexed as

approved vaccineinfluenzaparental acceptanceunfunded vaccinevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36298633
PMCPMC9606895
OpenAlexW4307188345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.