ArticleVaccines2022
IntegralVac: A Machine Learning-Based Comprehensive Multivalent Epitope Vaccine Design Method.
Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor Microenvironment in Neuroblastoma and Immunotherapeutic Approaches: Towards More Effective Treatment.Cancers · 2026Review
- AutoEpiCollect 2.0: A Web-Based Machine Learning Tool for Personalized Peptide Cancer Vaccine Design.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning in next-generation vaccine development for infectious diseases.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- MHC-I pathway disruption by viruses: insights into immune evasion and vaccine design for animals.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Innovative Immunoinformatics Tools for Enhancing MHC (Major Histocompatibility Complex) Class I Epitope Prediction in Immunoproteomics.Protein and peptide letters · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in the development of vaccines and immunotherapeutics-yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- AutoEpiCollect, a Novel Machine Learning-Based GUI Software for Vaccine Design: Application to Pan-Cancer Vaccine Design Targeting PIK3CA Neoantigens.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- AutoPepVax, a Novel Machine-Learning-Based Program for Vaccine Design: Application to a Pan-Cancer Vaccine Targeting EGFR Missense Mutations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Peptide Vaccine Design Targeting KIT Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the growing field of vaccine design for COVID and cancer research, it is essential to predict accurate peptide binding affinity and immunogenicity. We developed a comprehensive machine learning method, 'IntegralVac,' by integrating three existing deep learning tools: DeepVacPred, MHCSeqNet, and HemoPI. IntegralVac makes predictions for single and multivalent cancer and COVID-19 epitopes without manually selecting epitope prediction possibilities. We performed several rounds of optimization before integration, then re-trained IntegralVac for multiple datasets. We validated the IntegralVac with 4500 human cancer MHC I peptides obtained from the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) and with cancer and COVID epitopes previously selected in our laboratory. The other data referenced from existing deep learning tools served as a positive control to ensure successful prediction was possible. As evidenced by increased accuracy and AUC, IntegralVac improved the prediction rate of top-ranked epitopes. We also examined the compatibility between other servers' clinical checkpoint filters and IntegralVac. This was to ensure that the other servers had a means for predicting additional checkpoint filters that we wanted to implement in IntegralVac. The clinical checkpoint filters, including allergenicity, antigenicity, and toxicity, were used as additional predictors to improve IntegralVac's prediction accuracy. We generated immunogenicity scores by cross-comparing sequence inputs with each other and determining the overlap between each individual peptide sequence. The IntegralVac increased the immunogenicity prediction accuracy to 90.1% AUC and the binding affinity accuracy to 95.4% compared to the control NetMHCPan server. The IntegralVac opens new avenues for future in silico methods, by building upon established models for continued prediction accuracy improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.