Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36298542›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Immune Persistence against SARS-CoV-2 after Primary and Booster Immunization in Humans: A Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study.

Juan Li, Hui Xie, Weixin Chen, Meng Chen, Shuang Bai, Wei Zhao, Tao Zhou, Pei Gao, Lichi Zhang, Quanyi Wang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan LiBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6096-3886
Hui XieBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Weixin ChenBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Meng ChenBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Shuang BaiBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Wei ZhaoBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Tao ZhouBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Pei GaoBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Lichi ZhangBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Quanyi WangBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Xinghuo PangBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Chun HuangBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Jiang WuBeijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100013, China.
Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission No.Z211100002521014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amid the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic, limited literature exists on immune persistence after primary immunization and the immunogenic features of booster vaccines administered at different time intervals. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the immune attenuation of neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 wild-type strain, and Delta and Omicron variants 12 months after the primary administration of the COVID-19 inactivated vaccine and evaluate the immune response after a booster administration at different time intervals. A total of 514 individuals were followed up after primary immunization and were vaccinated with a booster. Neutralizing antibodies against the wild-type strain and Delta and Omicron variant spike proteins were measured using pseudovirus neutralization assays. The geometric mean titers (GMTs) after the primary and booster immunizations were 12.09 and 61.48 for the wild-type strain, 11.67 and 40.33 for the Delta variant, and 8.51 and 29.31 for the Omicron variant, respectively. The GMTs against the wild-type strain declined gradually during the 12 months after the primary immunization, and were lower against the two variants. After implementing a booster immunization with a 6 month interval, the GMTs against the wild-type strain were higher than those obtained beyond the 7 month interval; however, the GMTs against the two variants were not statistically different across 3-12 month intervals. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 variants showed remarkable declines in immune persistence, especially against the Omicron variant. The booster administration interval could be shortened to 3 months in endemic areas of the Omicron variant, whereas an appropriate prolonging of the booster administration interval did not affect the booster immunization effect.

Indexed as

boosterCOVID-19Deltaimmune responseinactive vaccineOmicron

Identifiers

PMID36298542
PMCPMC9609025
OpenAlexW4304190025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.