ArticleVaccines2022
Development and Qualification of an Antigen Integrity Assay for a
Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
During development of a subunit vaccine, monitoring integrity of the recombinant protein for process development and quality control is critical. Pfs230 is a leading malaria transmission blocking vaccine candidate and the first to reach a Phase 2 clinical trial. The Pfs230 protein is expressed on the surface of gametes, and plays an important role in male fertility. While the potency of Pfs230 protein can be determined by a standard membrane-feeding assay (SMFA) using antibodies from immunized subjects, the precision of a general in vivo potency study is known to be poor and is also time-consuming. Therefore, using a well-characterized Pfs230 recombinant protein and two human anti-Pfs230 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which have functional activity judged by SMFA, a sandwich ELISA-based in vitro potency assay, called the Antigen Integrity Assay (AIA), was developed. Multiple validation parameters of AIA were evaluated to qualify the assay following International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Q2(R1) guidelines. The AIA is a high throughput assay and demonstrated excellent precision (3.2 and 5.4% coefficients of variance for intra- and inter-assay variability, respectively) and high sensitivity (>12% impurity in a sample can be detected). General methodologies and the approach to assay validation described herein are amenable to any subunit vaccine as long as more than two functional, non-competing mAbs are available. Thus, this study supports future subunit vaccine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.