Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36298478›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Immunogenicity after a Third COVID-19 mRNA Booster in Solid Cancer Patients Who Previously Received the Primary Heterologous CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 Vaccine.

Sutima Luangdilok, Passakorn Wanchaijiraboon, Nussara Pakvisal, Thiti Susiriwatananont, Nicha Zungsontiporn, Virote Sriuranpong, Panot Sainamthip, Nungruthai Suntronwong, Preeyaporn Vichaiwattana, Nasamon Wanlapakorn and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Impact of COVID-19 vaccination on cancer patients: safety, efficacy, and long-term effects.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sutima LuangdilokDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1415-2331
Passakorn WanchaijiraboonPhrapokklao Cancer Center of Excellence, Phrapokklao Clinical Research Center, Phrapokklao Genomic Laboratories, Phrapokklao Hospital, Mueang District, Chanthaburi 22000, Thailand.
Nussara PakvisalDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8430-6151
Thiti SusiriwatananontDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Nicha ZungsontipornDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Virote SriuranpongDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Panot SainamthipDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Nungruthai SuntronwongCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Preeyaporn VichaiwattanaCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Nasamon WanlapakornCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Yong PoovorawanCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-6807
Nattaya TeeyapunDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Suebpong TanasanvimonDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Chulalongkorn University · THPrapokklao Hospital · TH

Funding

Chulalongkorn Medical Oncology Research FundQuality Improvement Fund, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross SocietySirivadhanabhakdi Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No data regarding the efficacy of a third mRNA vaccine for solid cancer patients previously primed with the heterologous CoronoVac/ChAdOx1 vaccination implemented in Thailand during the shortage of vaccine supply are available. Forty-four cancer patients who previously received the heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 regimen were boosted with a third mRNA COVID vaccine, either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Anti-RBD IgG was measured immediately before, two weeks after, and four weeks after the third dose. The antibody response was compared to 87 age- and gender-matched cancer patients who were primed with the homologous ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 regimens. Post-third dose anti-RBD IgG levels significantly increased compared to pre-third dose levels. There was no statistical difference in post-third dose antibody titers or neutralization levels between these two primary series regimens. Treatment with chemotherapy was associated with a lower antibody response compared to endocrine therapy/biologics. Similar antibody levels were observed after a third booster with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 following heterologous CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 vaccination. There was no statistical difference in the immune response following the third-dose vaccination between cancer patients and healthy individuals who received the same heterologous CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 vaccination. In conclusion, a similar degree of enhanced immunogenicity was observed after a third mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in solid cancer patients who previously received the heterologous CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 regimens.

Indexed as

booster vaccinecancerChAdOx1CoronaVacCOVID-19 vaccineheterologous primary vaccinationimmunogenicityomicronSARS-CoV-2third dose vaccine

Identifiers

PMID36298478
PMCPMC9608216
OpenAlexW4298003415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.