Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36298448›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Vaccine Hesitancy during the Coronavirus Pandemic in South Tyrol, Italy: Linguistic Correlates in a Representative Cross-Sectional Survey.

Verena Barbieri, Christian J Wiedermann, Stefano Lombardo, Dietmar Ausserhofer, Barbara Plagg, Giuliano Piccoliori, Timon Gärtner, Wolfgang Wiedermann, Adolf Engl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Verena BarbieriInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Christian J WiedermannInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4639-8195
Stefano LombardoProvincial Institute for Statistics of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano-South Tyrol (ASTAT), 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Dietmar AusserhoferInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Barbara PlaggInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6116-7504
Giuliano PiccolioriInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Timon GärtnerProvincial Institute for Statistics of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano-South Tyrol (ASTAT), 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Wolfgang WiedermannDepartment of Educational, School and Counseling Psychology, College of Education and Human Development, Missouri Prevention Science Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Adolf EnglInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Ospedale di Bolzano · ITFree University of Bozen-Bolzano · ITUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Autonomous Province of Bolzano, Italy n.a.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGerman is a minority language in Italy and is spoken by the majority of the inhabitants of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano, South Tyrol. Linguistic group membership in South Tyrol is an established determinant of health information-seeking behavior. Because the COVID-19 incidence and vaccination coverage in the second year of the pandemic in Italy was the worst in South Tyrol, we investigated whether linguistic group membership is related to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted on a probability-based sample of 1425 citizens from South Tyrol in March 2021. The questionnaire collected information on socio-demographics, including linguistic group membership, comorbidities, COVID-19-related experiences, conspiracy thinking, well-being, altruism, and likelihood of accepting the national vaccination plan. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the significant predictors of vaccine hesitancy.

resultsOverall, 15.6 percent of the sample reported vaccine hesitancy, which was significantly higher among German speakers than among other linguistic groups. Increased hesitancy was mostly observed in young age, the absence of chronic disease, rural residence, a worsened economic situation, mistrust in institutions, and conspiracy thinking. In the multiple logistic regression analyses, linguistic group membership was not an independent predictor of vaccine hesitancy.

conclusionAlthough German is a minority language in Italy and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was higher in the German native language group than in the Italian, linguistic group membership was not an independent predictor of hesitancy in the autonomous province. Known predictors of vaccine hesitancy are distributed unevenly across language groups. Whether language group-specific intervention strategies to promote vaccine hesitancy are useful requires further study.

Indexed as

COVID-19hesitancylinguistic minoritiesvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36298448
PMCPMC9607221
OpenAlexW4296834443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.