Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36298443›Full record

ReviewVaccines2022

Outer Membrane Vesicles: An Emerging Vaccine Platform.

Dharmendra Kashyap, Mrutyunjaya Panda, Budhadev Baral, Nidhi Varshney, Sajitha R, Vasundhra Bhandari, Hamendra Singh Parmar, Amit Prasad, Hem Chandra Jha

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mucosal immunity and vaccine development.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Outer membrane vesicles fromMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  8. Microbial Biotechnology in Medicine.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Dharmendra KashyapDepartment of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore 453552, India.
Mrutyunjaya PandaDepartment of Life Science, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela 769008, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5652-3316
Budhadev BaralDepartment of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore 453552, India.
Nidhi VarshneyDepartment of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore 453552, India.
Sajitha RAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Noida, Amity 201313, India.
Vasundhra BhandariDepartment of Biological Science, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hyderabad 500037, India.
Hamendra Singh ParmarSchool of Biotechnology, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya Indore, Indore 452001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9866-2760
Amit PrasadSchool of Basic Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi 175005, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4235-9201
Hem Chandra JhaDepartment of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore 453552, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9698-4547
Indian Institute of Technology Indore · INAmity University · INDevi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya · INIndian Institute of Technology Mandi · INNational Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) - Ahmedabad · INNational Institute of Technology Rourkela · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine adjuvants are substances that improve the immune capacity of a recombinant vaccine to a great extent and have been in use since the early 1900s; they are primarily short-lived and initiate antigen activity, mainly an inflammatory response. With the developing technologies and innovation, early options such as alum were modified, yet the inorganic nature of major vaccine adjuvants caused several side effects. Outer membrane vesicles, which respond to the stressed environment, are small nano-sized particles secreted by gram-negative bacteria. The secretory nature of OMV gives us many benefits in terms of infection bioengineering. This article aims to provide a detailed overview of bacteria's outer membrane vesicles (OMV) and their potential usage as adjuvants in making OMV-based vaccines. The OMV adjuvant-based vaccines can be a great benefactor, and there are ongoing trials for formulating OMV adjuvant-based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2. This study emphasizes engineering the OMVs to develop better versions for safety purposes. This article will also provide a gist about the advantages and disadvantages of such vaccines, along with other aspects.

Indexed as

adjuvantsouter membrane vesicles (OMV)vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36298443
PMCPMC9610665
OpenAlexW4296834441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.