ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Super-Resolving Methodology for Noisy Unpaired Datasets.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although it is possible to acquire high-resolution and low-resolution paired datasets, their use in directly supervised learning is impractical in real-world applications. In the present work, we focus on a practical methodology for image acquisition in real-world conditions. The main method of noise reduction involves averaging multiple noisy input images into a single image with reduced noise; we also consider unpaired datasets that contain misalignments between the high-resolution and low-resolution images. The results show that when more images are used for average denoising, better performance is achieved in the super-resolution task. Quantitatively, for a fixed noise level with a variance of 60, the proposed method of using 16 images for average denoising shows better performance than using 4 images for average denoising; it shows 0.68 and 0.0279 higher performance for the peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index map metrics, as well as 0.0071 and 1.5553 better performance for the learned perceptual image patch similarity and natural image quality evaluator metrics, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.