Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36298311›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Computer Vision and Machine Learning-Based Gait Pattern Recognition for Flat Fall Prediction.

Biao Chen, Chaoyang Chen, Jie Hu, Zain Sayeed, Jin Qi, Hussein F Darwiche, Bryan E Little, Shenna Lou, Muhammad Darwish, Christopher Foote and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gait analysis for Parkinson's disease using multiscale entropy.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. EgoFall: Real-Time Privacy-Preserving Fall Risk Assessment With a Single On-Body Tracking Camera.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Risk Prediction and Interpretation for Fall Events Using Explainable AI and Large Language Models.Proceedings of the 2025 9th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics. International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (9th : 2025 : Kyoto, Japan) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Biao ChenState Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Chaoyang ChenOrthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Jie HuState Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Zain SayeedOrthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Jin QiState Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4085-5041
Hussein F DarwicheOrthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Bryan E LittleOrthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Shenna LouSouth Texas Health System-McAllen Department of Trauma, McAllen, TX 78503, USA.
Muhammad DarwishSouth Texas Health System-McAllen Department of Trauma, McAllen, TX 78503, USA.
Christopher FooteSouth Texas Health System-McAllen Department of Trauma, McAllen, TX 78503, USA.
Carlos Palacio-LascanoSouth Texas Health System-McAllen Department of Trauma, McAllen, TX 78503, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGait recognition has been applied in the prediction of the probability of elderly flat ground fall, functional evaluation during rehabilitation, and the training of patients with lower extremity motor dysfunction. Gait distinguishing between seemingly similar kinematic patterns associated with different pathological entities is a challenge for the clinician. How to realize automatic identification and judgment of abnormal gait is a significant challenge in clinical practice. The long-term goal of our study is to develop a gait recognition computer vision system using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) computing. This study aims to find an optimal ML algorithm using computer vision techniques and measure variables from lower limbs to classify gait patterns in healthy people. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of computer vision and machine learning (ML) computing in discriminating different gait patterns associated with flat-ground falls.

methodsWe used the Kinect

resultsThe SVM and KNN had a higher accuracy than CNN and LSTM. The SVM (94.9 ± 3.36%) had the highest accuracy in the classification of gait patterns, followed by KNN (94.0 ± 4.22%). The accuracy of CNN was 87.6 ± 7.50% and that of LSTM 83.6 ± 5.35%.

conclusionsThis study revealed that the proposed AI machine learning (ML) techniques can be used to design gait biometric systems and machine vision for gait pattern recognition. Potentially, this method can be used to remotely evaluate elderly patients and help clinicians make decisions regarding disposition, follow-up, and treatment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGaitAgedComputersHumansMachine LearningSupport Vector Machineconvolutional neural networkfall recognitiongaitk nearest neighborlong short-time memorymachine learningpattern recognitionsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID36298311
PMCPMC9612353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.