ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Explainable Machine-Learning-Based Characterization of Abnormal Cortical Activities for Working Memory of Restless Legs Syndrome Patients.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Correlates of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Based on Electroencephalogram (EEG)-A Mechanistic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Big data approaches for novel mechanistic insights on sleep and circadian rhythms: a workshop summary.Sleep · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal characteristics of cortical activities of REM sleep behavior disorder revealed by explainable machine learning using 3D convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sensorimotor disorder accompanied by a strong urge to move the legs and an unpleasant sensation in the legs, and is known to accompany prefrontal dysfunction. Here, we aimed to clarify the neural mechanism of working memory deficits associated with RLS using machine-learning-based analysis of single-trial neural activities. A convolutional neural network classifier was developed to discriminate the cortical activities between RLS patients and normal controls. A layer-wise relevance propagation was applied to the trained classifier in order to determine the critical nodes in the input layer for the output decision, i.e., the time/location of cortical activities discriminating RLS patients and normal controls during working memory tasks. Our method provided high classification accuracy (~94%) from single-trial event-related potentials, which are known to suffer from high inter-trial/inter-subject variation and low signal-to-noise ratio, after strict separation of training/test/validation data according to leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. The determined critical areas overlapped with the cortical substrates of working memory, and the neural activities in these areas were correlated with some significant clinical scores of RLS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.