Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36298094›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Identification of Single Yeast Budding Using Impedance Cytometry with a Narrow Electrode Span.

Xun Liu, Tao Tang, Po-Wei Yi, Yapeng Yuan, Cheng Lei, Ming Li, Yo Tanaka, Yoichiroh Hosokawa, Yaxiaer Yalikun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Xun LiuDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama-cho, Ikoma 630-0192, Nara, Japan.
Tao TangDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama-cho, Ikoma 630-0192, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0477-8322
Po-Wei YiDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama-cho, Ikoma 630-0192, Nara, Japan.
Yapeng YuanCenter for Biosystems Dynamics Research (BDR), RIKEN, 1-3 Yamadaoka, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Cheng LeiThe Institute of Technological Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
Ming LiSchool of Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.
Yo TanakaCenter for Biosystems Dynamics Research (BDR), RIKEN, 1-3 Yamadaoka, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Yoichiroh HosokawaDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama-cho, Ikoma 630-0192, Nara, Japan.
Yaxiaer YalikunDivision of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama-cho, Ikoma 630-0192, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0569-6740
Nara Institute of Science and Technology · JPRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JPMacquarie University · AUNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impedance cytometry is wildly used in single-cell detection, and its sensitivity is essential for determining the status of single cells. In this work, we focus on the effect of electrode gap on detection sensitivity. Through comparing the electrode span of 1 µm and 5 µm, our work shows that narrowing the electrode span could greatly improve detection sensitivity. The mechanism underlying the sensitivity improvement was analyzed via numerical simulation. The small electrode gap (1 µm) allows the electric field to concentrate near the detection area, resulting in a high sensitivity for tiny particles. This finding is also verified with the mixture suspension of 1 µm and 3 µm polystyrene beads. As a result, the electrodes with 1 µm gap can detect more 1 µm beads in the suspension than electrodes with 5 µm gap. Additionally, for single yeast cells analysis, it is found that impedance cytometry with 1 µm electrodes gap can easily distinguish budding yeast cells, which cannot be realized by the impedance cytometry with 5 µm electrodes gap. All experimental results support that narrowing the electrode gap is necessary for tiny particle detection, which is an important step in the development of submicron and nanoscale impedance cytometry.

Indexed as

PolystyrenesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeElectric ImpedanceElectrodesSingle-Cell AnalysisPolystyrenesdetection sensitivityelectrode gapimpedance cytometryyeast cells

Identifiers

PMID36298094
PMCPMC9609181
OpenAlexW4304775454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.