ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Modeling of Respiratory Motion to Support the Minimally Invasive Destruction of Liver Tumors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRespiratory movements are a significant factor that may hinder the use of image navigation systems during minimally invasive procedures used to destroy focal lesions in the liver. This article aims to present a method of estimating the displacement of the target point due to respiratory movements during the procedure, working in real time.
methodThe real-time method using skin markers and non-rigid registration algorithms has been implemented and tested for various classes of transformation. The method was validated using clinical data from 21 patients diagnosed with liver tumors. For each patient, each marker was treated as a target and the remaining markers as target position predictors, resulting in 162 configurations and 1095 respiratory cycles analyzed. In addition, the possibility of estimating the respiratory phase signal directly from intraoperative US images and the possibility of synchronization with the 4D CT respiratory sequence are also presented, based on ten patients.
resultsThe median value of the target registration error (TRE) was 3.47 for the non-rigid registration method using the combination of rigid transformation and elastic body spline curves, and an adaptation of the assessing quality using image registration circuits (AQUIRC) method. The average maximum distance was 3.4 (minimum: 1.6, maximum 6.8) mm.
conclusionsThe proposed method obtained promising real-time TRE values. It also allowed for the estimation of the TRE at a given geometric margin level to determine the estimated target position. Directions for further quantitative research and the practical possibility of combining both methods are also presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.