ArticlePolymers2022
Evaluation of the Orthotropic Behavior in an Auxetic Structure Based on a Novel Design Parameter of a Square Cell with Re-Entrant Struts.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topology-Driven Compression and Energy Absorption of PLA-Lattice-Reinforced Mortar.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Resin-Reinforced Auxetic Structures with Re-Entrant Struts for Improved Energy Absorption.Polymers · 2025Article
- Metamortar Composites Reinforced with Re-Entrant Auxetic Cells: Mechanical Performance and Enhanced Energy Absorption.Polymers · 2025Article
- Effects of Build Orientation and Loading Direction on the Compressive Behavior of Additively Manufactured Re-Entrant Auxetic Materials.Polymers · 2025Article
- Clinical Application of 3D-Printed Custom Hemipelvic Prostheses With Re-Entrant Chiral Structure in Reconstruction After Pelvic Tumor Resection.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Biomimetic Lattice Structures Design and Manufacturing for High Stress, Deformation, and Energy Absorption Performance.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this research, a three-dimensional auxetic configuration based on a known re-entrant cell is proposed. The 3D auxetic cell is configured from a new design parameter that produces an internal rotation angle to its re-entrant elements to study elastic properties in its three orthogonal directions. Through a topological analysis using Timoshenko beam theory, the bending of its re-entrant struts is modeled as a function of the new design parameter to manipulate Poisson's ratio and Young's modulus. Experimental samples were fabricated using a fused filament fabrication system using ABS and subsequently tested under quasi-static compression and bending tests. Additionally, an orthotropy factor is applied that allows for measuring the deviation between the mechanical properties of each structure. The experimental results validate the theoretical design and show that this new unit cell can transmit an orthotropic mechanical behavior to the macrostructure. In addition, the proposed structure can provide a different bending stiffness behavior in up to three working directions, which allows the application under different conditions of external forces, such as a prosthetic ankle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.