Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36297598›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Liposomal Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy: The Rotterdam Experience.

Mohamadreza Amin, Ann L B Seynhaeve, Majid Sharifi, Mojtaba Falahati, Timo L M Ten Hagen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anti-EGFR liposomal drug delivery system loaded with AGYInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Current advancements in nanotechnology for stem cells.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Tailoring biomaterials for vaccine delivery.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Liposomal nanotherapeutics for cancer treatment: Targeted delivery and immunotherapy.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamadreza AminLaboratory Experimental Oncology, Precision Medicine in Oncology (PrMiO), Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7520-410X
Ann L B SeynhaeveLaboratory Experimental Oncology, Precision Medicine in Oncology (PrMiO), Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Majid SharifiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud 3614773955, Iran.
Mojtaba FalahatiLaboratory Experimental Oncology, Precision Medicine in Oncology (PrMiO), Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Timo L M Ten HagenLaboratory Experimental Oncology, Precision Medicine in Oncology (PrMiO), Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-7740
Erasmus MC · NLShahroud University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the Nanomedicine Innovation Center (NICE) at the Erasmus MC in Rotterdam, we have approached the treatment of cancer by starting with a vision of first establishing a platform that enables us to overcome the low levels of drugs delivered to tumors and the issue of dose-limiting toxicity. Showing that a reduction of the volume of distribution, and a lowering of toxicity and side-effects, accompanied by augmented intratumoral drug delivery, could change outcomes in patients, paved the way to target, not only localized disease, but also systemic and metastasized cancers. In particular, the detailed studies with intravital microscopy we performed at NICE provided us with the necessary insights and affected to a large extent our program on liposome-based cancer therapy. Together with our experience with the loco-regional treatment of cancer, this helped us to develop a program that focused on the subsequent aspects discussed here. We recognized that passive accumulation of nanoparticles was not as effective as previously believed and undertook to improve the local accumulation by changing the tumor pathophysiology and, in particular, the vascular permeability. We added the targeting of liposomes using vascular and tumor directed moieties, to improve cellular drug delivery. To improve payload delivery, we studied the modification of liposomes with phospholipids that help passive drug release and augment cellular accumulation. Second, and importantly, modification of liposomes was undertaken, to enable triggered drug release. The capability for modifying liposomes to respond to a trigger, and the ability to now apply an external trigger (e.g., hyperthermia) and specifically reach the tumor volume, resulted in the current smart drug delivery systems. Our experience at NICE, after a few decades of research on lipid-based nanoparticles, shows that, after the first liposomal formulation registered for clinical application in cancer therapy, further developments quickly followed, while further clinical applications lagged behind. Now we need to focus on and make the next steps towards the clinic, to fulfil the promise that is found there.

Indexed as

active targetingcancer therapydrug deliveryhyperthermiaintravital microscopyliposomessmart drug delivery systemtemperature sensitive liposomesThe Netherlandsvascular permeabilizationvascular targeting

Identifiers

PMID36297598
PMCPMC9607095
OpenAlexW4304811978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.