Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36297556›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Impact of Guidelines Regarding Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) Deficiency Screening Using Uracil-Based Phenotyping on the Reduction of Severe Side Effect of 5-Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy: A Propension Score Analysis.

Nicolas Laures, Céline Konecki, Mathias Brugel, Anne-Lise Giffard, Naceur Abdelli, Damien Botsen, Claire Carlier, Claire Gozalo, Catherine Feliu, Florian Slimano and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. mSphere · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas LauresDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), 51100 Reims, France.
Céline KoneckiDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), HERVI EA3801, 51097 Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6214-1613
Mathias BrugelDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), 51100 Reims, France.
Anne-Lise GiffardDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), 51100 Reims, France.
Naceur AbdelliDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Chalons en Champagne, 51000 Chalons en Champagne, France.
Damien BotsenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), 51100 Reims, France.
Claire CarlierDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), 51100 Reims, France.
Claire GozaloDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), HERVI EA3801, 51097 Reims, France.
Catherine FeliuDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), HERVI EA3801, 51097 Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3928-8908
Florian SlimanoDepartment of Pharmacy, CHU Reims, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), 51100 Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5139-7034
Zoubir DjeradaDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), HERVI EA3801, 51097 Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4022-7889
Olivier BouchéDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), HERVI EA3801, 51097 Reims, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8284-3743
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRConseil Régional de Champagne-Ardenne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is associated with severe fluoropyrimidines-induced toxicity. As of September 2018, French recommendations call for screening for DPD deficiency by plasma uracil quantification prior to all fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. A dose reduction of fluoropyrimidine is recommended when uracil concentration is equal to or greater than 16 ng/mL. This matched retrospective study assessed the impact of DPD screening on the reduction of severe side effects and on the management of DPD-deficient patients. Using a propensity score, we balanced the factors influencing 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity. Then, the severity scores (G3 and G4 severity as well as their frequency) of patients who did not benefit from DPD screening were compared with those of patients who benefited from DPD screening for each treatment cycle (from 1 to 4). Among 349 screened patients, 198 treated patients were included. Among them, 31 (15.7%) had DPD deficiency (median uracilemia 19.8 ng/mL (range: 16.1−172.3)). The median toxicity severity score was higher in the unscreened group for each treatment cycle (0 vs. 1, p < 0.001 at each cycle from 1 to 4) as well as the cumulative score during all courses of treatment (p = 0.028). DPD-deficient patients received a significantly lower dose of 5-FU (p < 0.001). This study suggests that pretherapeutic plasmatic uracil assessment, along with 5-FU dosage adjustment, may be beneficial in reducing 5-FU toxicity in real-life patients.

Indexed as

adverse effectsdihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiencyfluorouraciluracil

Identifiers

PMID36297556
PMCPMC9610761
OpenAlexW4303962043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.