Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36297549›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Toward Optimized

Helen Damerow, Xia Cheng, Valeska von Kiedrowski, Ralf Schirrmacher, Björn Wängler, Gert Fricker, Carmen Wängler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen DamerowBiomedical Chemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Xia ChengMolecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Valeska von KiedrowskiMolecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Ralf SchirrmacherDivision of Oncologic Imaging, Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7098-3036
Björn WänglerMolecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3877-5576
Gert FrickerInstitute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3894-961X
Carmen WänglerBiomedical Chemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1161-8669
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 13GW0388AWilhelm Sander Stiftung 2018.086.1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

89Zr represents a highly favorable positron emitter for application in immuno-PET (Positron Emission Tomography) imaging. Clinically, the 89Zr4+ ion is introduced into antibodies by complexation with desferrioxamine B. However, producing complexes of limited kinetic inertness. Therefore, several new chelators for 89Zr introduction have been developed over the last years. Of these, the direct comparison of the most relevant ones for clinical translation, DFO* and 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO), is still missing. Thus, we directly compared DFO with DFO* and 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO) immunoconjugates to identify the most suitable agent stable 89Zr-complexation. The chelators were introduced into cetuximab, and an optical analysis method was developed, enabling the efficient quantification of derivatization sites per protein. The cetuximab conjugates were efficiently obtained and radiolabeled with 89Zr at 37 °C within 30 min, giving the [89Zr]Zr-cetuximab derivatives in high radiochemical yields and purities of >99% as well as specific activities of 50 MBq/mg. The immunoreactive fraction of all 89Zr-labeled cetuximab derivatives was determined to be in the range of 86.5−88.1%. In vivo PET imaging and ex vivo biodistribution studies in tumor-bearing animals revealed a comparable and significantly higher kinetic inertness for both [89Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)-cetuximab and [89Zr]Zr-DFO*-cetuximab, compared to [89Zr]Zr-DFO-cetuximab. Of these, [89Zr]Zr-DFO*-cetuximab showed a considerably more favorable pharmacokinetic profile with significantly lower liver and spleen retention than [89Zr]Zr-3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)-cetuximab. Since [89Zr]Zr-DFO* demonstrates a very high kinetic inertness, paired with a highly favorable pharmacokinetic profile of the resulting antibody conjugate, DFO* currently represents the most suitable chelator candidate for stable 89Zr-radiolabeling of antibodies and clinical translation.

Indexed as

3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO)89ZrbioconjugationcetuximabDFODFO*in vivo pharmacokineticskinetic inertness

Identifiers

PMID36297549
PMCPMC9611803
OpenAlexW4303962082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.