Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36297541›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Implementation and Cross-Validation of a Pharmacokinetic Model for Precision Dosing of Busulfan in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplanted Children.

Sylvain Goutelle, Yann Thoma, Roxane Buffet, Michael Philippe, Thierry Buclin, Monia Guidi, Chantal Csajka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sylvain GoutelleHospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Nord, Service de Pharmacie, 69005 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1853-2932
Yann ThomaSchool of Management and Engineering Vaud (HEIG-VD), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), 1401 Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4374-6104
Roxane BuffetSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Michael PhilippeInstitut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatrique & Centre Léon Bérard, Département de Pharmacie, 69008 Lyon, France.
Thierry BuclinService and Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0639-5536
Monia GuidiInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6419-9317
Chantal CsajkaSchool of Management and Engineering Vaud (HEIG-VD), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), 1401 Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0660-082X
University of Geneva · CHHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHInstitut d’Hématologie et d’Oncologie Pédiatrique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Busulfan, a drug used in conditioning prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children, has a narrow therapeutic margin. The model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) of busulfan is desirable, but there is a lack of validated tools. The objective of this study was to implement and cross-validate a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model in the Tucuxi software for busulfan MIPD in HSCT children. A search of the literature was performed to identify candidate population PK models. The goodness of fit of three selected models was assessed in a dataset of 178 children by computing the mean error (ME) and root-mean-squared error of prediction (RMSE). The best model was implemented in Tucuxi. The individual predicted concentrations, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and dosage requirements were compared between the Tucuxi model and a reference model available in the BestDose software in a subset of 61 children. The model from Paci et al. best fitted the data in the full dataset. In a subset of 61 patients, the predictive performance of Tucuxi and BestDose models was comparable with ME values of 6.4% and -2.5% and RMSE values of 11.4% and 13.6%, respectively. The agreement between the estimated AUC and the predicted dose was good, with 6.6% and 4.9% of the values being out of the 95% limits of agreement, respectively. To conclude, a PK model for busulfan MIPD was cross-validated and is now available in the Tucuxi software.

Indexed as

busulfanhematopoietic stem cell transplantationmodel-informed precision dosingoncologypediatricspopulation pharmacokineticstherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36297541
PMCPMC9611936
OpenAlexW4303961762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.