Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36297432›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Reliable Prediction of Caco-2 Permeability by Supervised Recursive Machine Learning Approaches.

Gabriela Falcón-Cano, Christophe Molina, Miguel Ángel Cabrera-Pérez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Explainable Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Drug Research.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriela Falcón-CanoUnidad de Modelación y Experimentación Biofarmacéutica, Centro de Bioactivos Químicos, Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de las Villas, Santa Clara 54830, Cuba.
Christophe MolinaPIKAÏROS, S.A., 31650 Saint-Orens-de-Gameville, France.
Miguel Ángel Cabrera-PérezUnidad de Modelación y Experimentación Biofarmacéutica, Centro de Bioactivos Químicos, Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de las Villas, Santa Clara 54830, Cuba.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heterogeneity of the Caco-2 cell line and differences in experimental protocols for permeability assessment using this cell-based method have resulted in the high variability of Caco-2 permeability measurements. These problems have limited the generation of large datasets to develop accurate and applicable regression models. This study presents a QSPR approach developed on the KNIME analytical platform and based on a structurally diverse dataset of over 4900 molecules. Interpretable models were obtained using random forest supervised recursive algorithms for data cleaning and feature selection. The development of a conditional consensus model based on regional and global regression random forest produced models with RMSE values between 0.43-0.51 for all validation sets. The potential applicability of the model as a surrogate for the in vitro Caco-2 assay was demonstrated through blind prediction of 32 drugs recommended by the International Council for the Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals (ICH) for validation of in vitro permeability methods. The model was validated for the preliminary estimation of the BCS/BDDCS class. The KNIME workflow developed to automate new drug prediction is freely available. The results suggest that this automated prediction platform is a reliable tool for identifying the most promising compounds with high intestinal permeability during the early stages of drug discovery.

Indexed as

Caco-2KNIMEpermeabilityquantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR)regression

Identifiers

PMID36297432
PMCPMC9610902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.