Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36297118›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

PROTEIN AI Advisor: A Knowledge-Based Recommendation Framework Using Expert-Validated Meals for Healthy Diets.

Kiriakos Stefanidis, Dorothea Tsatsou, Dimitrios Konstantinidis, Lazaros Gymnopoulos, Petros Daras, Saskia Wilson-Barnes, Kathryn Hart, Véronique Cornelissen, Elise Decorte, Elena Lalama and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review on Food Recommender Systems for Diabetic Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Kiriakos StefanidisInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9922-1916
Dorothea TsatsouInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Dimitrios KonstantinidisInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7391-6875
Lazaros GymnopoulosInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3310-102X
Petros DarasInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3814-6710
Saskia Wilson-BarnesSchool of Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9945-4800
Kathryn HartSchool of Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7494-9866
Véronique CornelissenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0578-4954
Elise DecorteDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Elena LalamaDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Charité, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Andreas PfeifferDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Charité, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6887-0016
Maria HassapidouDepartment of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, International Hellenic University, GR 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ioannis PagkalosDepartment of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, International Hellenic University, GR 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1538-4663
Anagnostis ArgiriouInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9164-632X
Konstantinos RouskasInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Stelios HadjidimitriouDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vasileios CharisisDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8007-2343
Sofia Balula DiasCentro Interdisciplinar de Estudo da Performance Humana (CIPER), Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, Dafundo, 1499-002 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8239-583X
José Alves DinizCentro Interdisciplinar de Estudo da Performance Humana (CIPER), Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, Dafundo, 1499-002 Lisbon, Portugal.
Gonçalo TeloPLUX, Wireless Biosignals, 1050-059 Lisbon, Portugal.
Hugo SilvaPLUX, Wireless Biosignals, 1050-059 Lisbon, Portugal.
Alex BensenousiIntrasoft International SA, 1253 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Kosmas DimitropoulosInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1584-7047
Information Technologies Institute · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRCentre for Research and Technology Hellas · GRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEInternational Hellenic University · GRKU Leuven · BEPLUX - Wireless Biosignals (Portugal) · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Surrey · GBINTRASOFT International (Luxembourg) · LU

Funding

EU Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 817732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AI-based software applications for personalized nutrition have recently gained increasing attention to help users follow a healthy lifestyle. In this paper, we present a knowledge-based recommendation framework that exploits an explicit dataset of expert-validated meals to offer highly accurate diet plans spanning across ten user groups of both healthy subjects and participants with health conditions. The proposed advisor is built on a novel architecture that includes (a) a qualitative layer for verifying ingredient appropriateness, and (b) a quantitative layer for synthesizing meal plans. The first layer is implemented as an expert system for fuzzy inference relying on an ontology of rules acquired by experts in Nutrition, while the second layer as an optimization method for generating daily meal plans based on target nutrient values and ranges. The system's effectiveness is evaluated through extensive experiments for establishing meal and meal plan appropriateness, meal variety, as well as system capacity for recommending meal plans. Evaluations involved synthetic data, including the generation of 3000 virtual user profiles and their weekly meal plans. Results reveal a high precision and recall for recommending appropriate ingredients in most user categories, while the meal plan generator achieved a total recommendation accuracy of 92% for all nutrient recommendations.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyMealsArtificial IntelligenceDietHumansNutritional Statusartificial intelligencemeal plan recommendationsontologypersonalized nutrition

Identifiers

PMID36297118
PMCPMC9612332
OpenAlexW4307261852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.