ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Corrugations in Free-Standing Graphene.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nitrogen vacancies in graphitic carbon nitride and their role in heterogeneous photocatalysis.Materials horizons · 2026Article
- Defects induce phase transition from dynamic to static rippling in graphene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Structural Dynamics in the Presence of Water of Graphene Bilayers with Defects.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Describing the scattering of keV protons through graphene.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although both the tendency of 2D materials to bend out of plane as well as its effect on materials' properties are well known, the factors influencing this phenomenon have not been extensively studied. Graphene, the one-atom-thick membrane of carbon atoms, is both arguably the best known 2D material, as well as the most prone to spontaneous corrugations. Here, we use electron diffraction to systematically study the factors influencing corrugations in graphene, including the size of the free-standing area, the preparation method, the amount of surface contamination, and electron-beam-induced structural disorder. We find that mechanically exfoliated graphene is less corrugated than graphene grown via chemical vapor deposition (corrugation amplitude of (0.83±0.10) Å compared to (1.33±0.20) Å for a free-standing area with a diameter of 1.7μm). Similarly, corrugation amplitude grows by more than a factor of two when the diameter of the free- standing area is increased from 1.7μm to ca. 3.0μm. Electron beam irradiation affects the corrugation in two ways, firstly by removing the hydrocarbon contamination, which decreases corrugation, and secondly by creating increasing amounts of disorder into the material, which again increases corrugation. Overall, our results show that control over the sample during both initial preparation and post-preparation treatment allows for a change in the amount of corrugation in free-standing 2D materials, which may lead to new advances in their use in applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.