Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36296467›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Analysis of the Antimicrobial and Anti-Biofilm Activity of Natural Compounds and Their Analogues against

Sobia Mastoor, Fizza Nazim, Syed Rizwan-Ul-Hasan, Khalid Ahmed, Shabnam Khan, Syed Nawazish Ali, Syed Hani Abidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antibiofilm and antibacterial effects ofBiomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Attenuation ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sobia MastoorDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan.
Fizza NazimDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Syed Rizwan-Ul-HasanDepartment of Computer Science, DHA Suffa University, Karachi 75500, Pakistan.
Khalid AhmedDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Shabnam KhanDepartment of Microbiology, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan.
Syed Nawazish AliDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan.
Syed Hani AbidiDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-9497-0902

Funding

Aga Khan University Research Module funds and The Akbarali Habib Bandeali endowment fundsHamdard University Seed Funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most frequent causes of biofilm-associated infections. With the emergence of antibiotic-resistant, especially methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), there is an urgent need to discover novel inhibitory compounds against this clinically important pathogen. In this study, we evaluated the antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity of 11 compounds, including phenyl propenes and phenolic aldehydes, eugenol, ferulic acid, sinapic acid, salicylaldehyde, vanillin, cinnamoyl acid, and aldehydes, against drug-resistant S. aureus isolates. (2) Methods: Thirty-two clinical S. aureus isolates were obtained from Alkhidmat Diagnostic Center and Blood Bank, Karachi, Pakistan, and screened for biofilm-forming potential, and susceptibility/resistance against ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, ampicillin, amikacin, cephalothin, clindamycin, streptomycin, and gentamicin using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Subsequently, 5 representative clinical isolates were selected and used to test the antimicrobial and anti-biofilm potential of 11 compounds using both qualitative and quantitative assays, followed by qPCR analysis to examine the differences in the expression levels of biofilm-forming genes (ica-A, fnb-B, clf-A and cna) in treated (with natural compounds and their derivatives) and untreated isolates. (3) Results: All isolates were found to be multi-drug resistant and dominant biofilm formers. The individual Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of natural compounds and their analogues ranged from 0.75−160 mg/mL. Furthermore, the compounds, Salicylaldehyde (SALI), Vanillin (VAN), α-methyl-trans-cinnamaldehyde (A-MT), and trans-4-nitrocinnamic acid (T4N) exhibited significant (15−92%) biofilm inhibition/reduction percentage capacity at the concentration of 1−10 mg/mL. Gene expression analysis showed that salicylaldehyde, α-methyl-trans-cinnamaldehyde, and α-bromo-trans-cinnamaldehyde resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) downregulation of the expression of ica-A, clf-A, and fnb-A genes compared to the untreated resistant isolate. (4) Conclusions: The natural compounds and their analogues used in this study exhibited significant antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity against S. aureus. Biofilms persist as the main concern in clinical settings. These compounds may serve as potential candidate drug molecules against biofilm forming S. aureus.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsAldehydesAmikacinAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBenzaldehydesBiofilmsCephalothinChloramphenicolCiprofloxacinClindamycinEugenolGentamicinsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAldehydesAmikacinAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBenzaldehydesCephalothinChloramphenicolCiprofloxacinClindamycinEugenolGentamicinssalicylaldehydeStreptomycinvanillinanti-biofilmantimicrobialgene expressionnatural compoundsStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID36296467
PMCPMC9610881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.