Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36296361›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Epidermal Microbiomes of Leopard Sharks (

Asha Z Goodman, Bhavya Papudeshi, Michael P Doane, Maria Mora, Emma Kerr, Melissa Torres, Jennifer Nero Moffatt, Lais Lima, Andrew P Nosal, Elizabeth Dinsdale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Asha Z GoodmanDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9015-4844
Bhavya PapudeshiCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 3929, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5359-3100
Michael P DoaneCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 3929, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9820-2193
Maria MoraDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
Emma KerrDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1446-4282
Melissa TorresScripps Institution of Oceanography, Universtity of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Jennifer Nero MoffattScripps Institution of Oceanography, Universtity of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7752-9525
Lais LimaDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
Andrew P NosalDepartment of Biology, Point Loma Nazarene University, San Diego, CA 92106, USA.
Elizabeth DinsdaleCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 3929, Australia.
San Diego State University · USFlinders University · AUScripps Institution of Oceanography · USPoint Loma Nazarene University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizations of shark-microbe systems in wild environments have outlined patterns of species-specific microbiomes; however, whether captivity affects these trends has yet to be determined. We used high-throughput shotgun sequencing to assess the epidermal microbiome belonging to leopard sharks (Triakis semifasciata) in captive (Birch Aquarium, La Jolla California born and held permanently in captivity), semi-captive (held in captivity for <1 year in duration and scheduled for release; Scripps Institute of Oceanography, San Diego, CA, USA) and wild environments (Moss Landing and La Jolla, CA, USA). Here, we report captive environments do not drive epidermal microbiome compositions of T. semifasciata to significantly diverge from wild counterparts as life-long captive sharks maintain a species-specific epidermal microbiome resembling those associated with semi-captive and wild populations. Major taxonomic composition shifts observed were inverse changes of top taxonomic contributors across captive duration, specifically an increase of Pseudoalteromonadaceae and consequent decrease of Pseudomonadaceae relative abundance as T. semifasciata increased duration in captive conditions. Moreover, we show captivity did not lead to significant losses in microbial α-diversity of shark epidermal communities. Finally, we present a novel association between T. semifasciata and the Muricauda genus as Metagenomes associated genomes revealed a consistent relationship across captive, semi-captive, and wild populations. Since changes in microbial communities is often associated with poor health outcomes, our report illustrates that epidermally associated microbes belonging to T. semifasciata are not suffering detrimental impacts from long or short-term captivity. Therefore, conservation programs which house sharks in aquariums are providing a healthy environment for the organisms on display. Our findings also expand on current understanding of shark epidermal microbiomes, explore the effects of ecologically different scenarios on benthic shark microbe associations, and highlight novel associations that are consistent across captive gradients.

Indexed as

biodiversitycaptivityChondrichthyesleopard sharkmetagenome-assembled genomesmicrobiomeuncultivated microorganisms

Identifiers

PMID36296361
PMCPMC9610875
OpenAlexW4307272938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.