Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36296223›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2022

Microencapsulation of Probiotics for Food Functionalization: An Update on Literature Reviews.

Maram Sbehat, Gianluigi Mauriello, Mohammad Altamimi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Microencapsulation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Rehydration Beverages Made fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Probiotics for Aquaculture: Hope, Truth, and Reality.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Skin Deep: The Potential of Microbiome Cosmetics.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maram SbehatDepartment of Nutrition and Food Technology, An-Najah National University, Nablus P.O. Box 7, Palestine.
Gianluigi MaurielloDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6876-6235
Mohammad AltamimiDepartment of Nutrition and Food Technology, An-Najah National University, Nablus P.O. Box 7, Palestine.ORCID 0000-0002-8804-5937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional foods comprise the largest growing food category due to both consumer demands and health claims by manufacturers. Probiotics are considered one of the best choices for meeting these demands. Traditionally, the food vehicle for introducing probiotics to consumers was dairy products, and to expand the benefits of probiotics for a wider range of consumers, the need to use other food items was essential. To achieve this goal while maximising the benefits of probiotics, protection methods used during food processing were tackled. The microencapsulation of probiotics is a promising methodology for achieving this function. This review highlights the use of the microencapsulation of probiotics in order to functionalise food items that initially were not considered suitable for probiotication, such as baked products, or to increase their functionality such as dairy products. The co-microencapsulation of probiotics with other functional ingredients such polyphenol, prebiotics, or omega-3 is also highlighted.

Indexed as

functional foodprobiotic cell preservationprobiotic food

Identifiers

PMID36296223
PMCPMC9610121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.