ArticleMicromachines2022
Micromanufactured Tactile Samples for Characterization of Rough and Dry Tactile Perception.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The quantitative characterization of tactile perception, which is crucial in the design of tactile devices, requires the tested samples to have individually and precisely controlled properties associated with the senses. In this work, we microfabricated such tactile samples and then quantitatively characterized tactile perception with a focus on roughness and dryness. In the roughness perception experiments, the tactile samples had a stripe pattern with ridge and groove widths that were individually controlled. The experimental results revealed that the feeling of roughness was more dominated by the width of the groove than that of the ridge and that conventionally used roughness parameters such as Sa and Sq were not sufficient for predicting roughness perception. In the dryness perception experiments, the tactile samples had a micropattern formed by dry etching and an array of squares. The experimental results revealed that dry perception had different properties when the feature sizes were below and above 30 µm, which may have been due to the effect of adhesion on friction. The proposed tactile samples were suitable for the quantitative and precise characterization of tactile perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.