Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36296007›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2022

Comparative Study and Simulation of Capacitive Sensors in Microfluidic Channels for Sensitive Red Blood Cell Detection.

Wei Hu, Bingxing Wu, Soumya K Srivastava, Suat Utku Ay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei HuThermo Fisher Scientific, Jinke Road 2537, Pudong District, Shanghai 201206, China.
Bingxing WuThermo Fisher Scientific, Jinke Road 2537, Pudong District, Shanghai 201206, China.
Soumya K SrivastavaDepartment of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6102, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5003-7993
Suat Utku AyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1023, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7640-4253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidics provides an indispensable platform for combining analytical operations such as sample preparation, mixing, separation/enrichment, and detection onto a single compact platform, defined as a lab-on-a-chip (LOC) device with applicability in biomedical and life science applications. Due to its ease of integration, 1D interdigital capacitive (IDC) sensors have been used in microfluidic platforms to detect particles of interest. This paper presents a comparative study on the use of capacitive sensors for microfluidic devices to detect bioparticles, more specifically red blood cells (RBCs). The detection sensitivities of 1D, 2D, and 3D capacitive sensors were determined by simulation using COMSOL Multiphysics

Indexed as

capacitive sensorinterdigital capacitor sensor (IDC)lab-on-chipmicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID36296007
PMCPMC9610494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.