Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36295903›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2022

Performance Verification of CYP2C19 Enzyme Abundance Polymorphism Settings within the Simcyp Simulator v21.

Caroline Sychterz, Iain Gardner, Manting Chiang, Ramakrishna Rachumallu, Sibylle Neuhoff, Vidya Perera, Samira Merali, Brian J Schmidt, Lu Gaohua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline SychterzClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ 08540, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7255-8500
Iain GardnerCertara UK Ltd., Simcyp Division, Sheffield S1 2BJ, UK.
Manting ChiangClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ 08540, USA.
Ramakrishna RachumalluCertara UK Ltd., Simcyp Division, Sheffield S1 2BJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8112-2450
Sibylle NeuhoffCertara UK Ltd., Simcyp Division, Sheffield S1 2BJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8809-1960
Vidya PereraClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ 08540, USA.
Samira MeraliClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ 08540, USA.
Brian J SchmidtClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ 08540, USA.
Lu GaohuaClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ 08540, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-492X
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USSimcyp (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has a number of applications, including assessing drug−drug interactions (DDIs) in polymorphic populations, and should be iteratively refined as science progresses. The Simcyp Simulator is annually updated and version 21 included updates to hepatic and intestinal CYP2C19 enzyme abundance, including addition of intermediate and rapid metabolizer phenotypes and changes to the ultra-rapid metabolizer enzyme abundance, with implications for population clearance and DDI predictions. This work details verification of the updates with sensitive CYP2C19 substrates, omeprazole and lansoprazole, using available clinical data from literature. Multiple assessments were performed, including recovery of areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and Cmax from compiled datasets for each drug, recovery of victim DDI ratios with CYP2C19 and/or CYP3A4 inhibition and recovery of relative exposure between phenotypes. Simulated data were within respective acceptance criteria for >80% of omeprazole AUC values, >70% of lansoprazole AUC and Cmax, >60% of AUC and Cmax DDI ratios and >80% of exposure ratios between different phenotypes. Recovery of omeprazole Cmax was lower (>50−70% within 2-fold) and possibly attributed to the variety of formulations used in the clinical dataset. Overall, the results demonstrated that the updated data used to parameterize CYP2C19 phenotypes reasonably described the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and lansoprazole in genotyped or phenotyped individuals.

Indexed as

CYP2C19PBPKpolymorphismpopulationSimcyp Simulator

Identifiers

PMID36295903
PMCPMC9607610
OpenAlexW4306937380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.