Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36295664›Full record

ReviewMembranes2022

Solid and Liquid Surface-Supported Bacterial Membrane Mimetics as a Platform for the Functional and Structural Studies of Antimicrobials.

Shiqi Li, Ruohua Ren, Letian Lyu, Jiangning Song, Yajun Wang, Tsung-Wu Lin, Anton Le Brun, Hsien-Yi Hsu, Hsin-Hui Shen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Membranes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Minimalist Model Lipid System Mimicking the Biophysical Properties ofLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025
    Article
  3. Susceptibility ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Shiqi LiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9619-9688
Ruohua RenDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7647-1878
Letian LyuDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4570-2896
Jiangning SongDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8031-9086
Yajun WangCollege of Chemistry & Materials Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-5883
Tsung-Wu LinDepartment of Chemistry, Tunghai University, No. 1727, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Xitun District, Taichung 40704, Taiwan.
Anton Le BrunAustralian Centre for Neutron Scattering, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Locked Bag 2001, Kirrawee DC, NSW 2232, Australia.
Hsien-Yi HsuDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5931-271X
Hsin-Hui ShenDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Division of Materials Science and Engineering · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation · AUCity University of Hong Kong · HKTunghai University · TWWenzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing antibiotic resistance has provoked the urgent need to investigate the interactions of antimicrobials with bacterial membranes. The reasons for emerging antibiotic resistance and innovations in novel therapeutic approaches are highly relevant to the mechanistic interactions between antibiotics and membranes. Due to the dynamic nature, complex compositions, and small sizes of native bacterial membranes, bacterial membrane mimetics have been developed to allow for the in vitro examination of structures, properties, dynamics, and interactions. In this review, three types of model membranes are discussed: monolayers, supported lipid bilayers, and supported asymmetric bilayers; this review highlights their advantages and constraints. From monolayers to asymmetric bilayers, biomimetic bacterial membranes replicate various properties of real bacterial membranes. The typical synthetic methods for fabricating each model membrane are introduced. Depending on the properties of lipids and their biological relevance, various lipid compositions have been used to mimic bacterial membranes. For example, mixtures of phosphatidylethanolamines (PE), phosphatidylglycerols (PG), and cardiolipins (CL) at various molar ratios have been used, approaching actual lipid compositions of Gram-positive bacterial membranes and inner membranes of Gram-negative bacteria. Asymmetric lipid bilayers can be fabricated on solid supports to emulate Gram-negative bacterial outer membranes. To probe the properties of the model bacterial membranes and interactions with antimicrobials, three common characterization techniques, including quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and neutron reflectometry (NR) are detailed in this review article. Finally, we provide examples showing that the combination of bacterial membrane models and characterization techniques is capable of providing crucial information in the design of new antimicrobials that combat bacterial resistance.

Indexed as

bacterial membranebilayermonolayerneutron reflectometryquartz crystal microbalancesurface plasmon resonance

Identifiers

PMID36295664
PMCPMC9609327
OpenAlexW4296743520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.