Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36295010›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Patients with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sandra Jiménez-Del-Barrio, Ricardo Medrano-de-la-Fuente, Ignacio Hernando-Garijo, María Teresa Mingo-Gómez, Elena Estébanez-de-Miguel, Luis Ceballos-Laita

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra Jiménez-Del-BarrioClinical Research in Health Sciences Group, Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology and Physiotherapy, University of Valladolid, Calle Universidad s/N, 42004 Soria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7460-3061
Ricardo Medrano-de-la-FuenteClinical Research in Health Sciences Group, Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology and Physiotherapy, University of Valladolid, Calle Universidad s/N, 42004 Soria, Spain.
Ignacio Hernando-GarijoClinical Research in Health Sciences Group, Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology and Physiotherapy, University of Valladolid, Calle Universidad s/N, 42004 Soria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4440-6064
María Teresa Mingo-GómezClinical Research in Health Sciences Group, Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology and Physiotherapy, University of Valladolid, Calle Universidad s/N, 42004 Soria, Spain.
Elena Estébanez-de-MiguelDepartment of Physiatrist and Nursery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Calle Domingo Miral s/N, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Luis Ceballos-LaitaClinical Research in Health Sciences Group, Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology and Physiotherapy, University of Valladolid, Calle Universidad s/N, 42004 Soria, Spain.
Universidad de Valladolid · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoarthritis is one of the most common degenerative joint diseases. The main symptoms of the osteoarthritis have been linked to the presence of myofascial trigger points in the soft tissues. Dry needing (DN) is the most investigated technique for the treatment of myofascial trigger points. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of DN in pain and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis in the short-, medium- and long-term.

methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, PEDro, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases were searched in September 2022. Randomized controlled trials involving DN compared to non-pharmacological interventions, sham techniques or no additional treatment were selected. Quality of the studies was assessed with PEDro scale and risk of bias with Cochrane Collaboration tool. Meta-analyses were conducted using fixed or random effects models according to the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.

resultsSeven studies were included in the meta-analysis involving 291 patients with osteoarthritis. The methodological quality of the included studies ranged from fair to high. DN showed significant improvements in pain intensity (SMD = -0.76; 95% CI: -1.24, -0.29; I

conclusionsVery low-quality evidence suggests a positive effect of DN for reducing pain intensity and improving physical function in the short term in patients with osteoarthritis. Further investigation is needed to determine a medium- and long-term effects.

Indexed as

dry needlingmeta-analysisosteoarthritissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36295010
PMCPMC9605049
OpenAlexW4304165770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.